Limits on Extraordinary Expenditure

One of the most important rules introduced by the new Law of Budgetary Accounts was the restriction on extraordinary credits. In the past, governments often created special funds for exceptional expenses, which placed a heavy burden on the State Budget and damaged financial stability. The new law put an end to this practice.

From that time forward, extraordinary expenditure could not exceed two million francs. Of this amount, one million was charged to the budget of the current year, according to Article 126 of the Constitution, while the other one million was carried over to the budget of the following year. No additional extraordinary credits could be created unless new sources of revenue were identified to cover them. This rule protected the financial health of the State and prevented governments from overspending.

Law on the Collection of Direct Taxes

The second reform was a Law for the Collection of Direct Taxes, which was sanctioned by royal decree on March 14th, 1905 and published in the Official Journal on March 23rd, 1905. This law introduced new measures to ensure the prompt and efficient collection of taxes. It strengthened the ability of the government to collect money owed by citizens, which in turn improved the reliability of State income Istanbul Tours Guide.

Law on Duties for Property Transfers

Another important reform was the Law on Duties for Property Transfers, ratified by Royal Decree No. 57 on January 13th, 1905, and published in the Official Journal on April 4th, 1905. This law created a progressive tax on inherited estates. It also increased the tax on gifts and reduced the number of people who had previously managed to avoid paying duties on personal property. By doing so, it made the tax system fairer and more effective.

Law on Excise and Alcohol Licenses

Finally, a Law on Excise and Licenses for Alcoholic Drinks was passed. It was ratified by royal decree on January 31st, 1905 and published in the Official Journal on the same day. Before this reform, not all alcoholic drinks were taxed, which meant that the State lost a significant amount of revenue. The new law introduced a more stable system of taxation, making sure that all alcoholic beverages were subject to excise duty.

This law also marked the first attempt to place the production and sale of alcohol under strict State control, both for financial reasons and for better regulation of the market.

Together, these financial reforms greatly strengthened the Bulgarian State’s revenue system. By limiting extraordinary spending, improving tax collection, creating fairer property duties, and regulating alcohol sales, the government built a more stable and predictable financial system. These measures ensured that the country’s finances were better protected and more capable of supporting future development.

The Role of the High Court of Accounts

The High Court of Accounts has the important duty of carefully checking the Government’s financial records. It examines every detail of State spending by comparing the budgeted items prepared by the Government with the actual accounts presented by the different departments. This process ensures that public money is used in a proper and lawful way.

After completing its review, the High Court of Accounts prepares a general report. This report is then submitted to the National Assembly, which has the final authority to approve or reject the financial accounts. In this way, financial control is shared between an independent body and the representatives of the people.

Stability of National Finances

Bulgaria’s finances at the start of the 20th century showed growing stability and strength. This progress was possible thanks to several important factors:

Improvements in agriculture and the development of national industries,

A steady increase in the population, which strengthened production and consumption,

Careful financial organisation within the Principality.

These measures made it possible for the country to maintain balanced finances and prepare for future growth.

Revenue Growth

The results of these efforts were clear in the State revenues. In 1905, the revenue reached 127,606,502 francs, which was the highest ever achieved at that time. For comparison, the revenue in 1904 was 119,655,507 francs, in 1903 it was 97,987,346 francs, and in 1902 it was 101,272,234 francs Istanbul Tours Guide.

This steady rise in income was largely due to a series of good harvests, which boosted agriculture, the main sector of the economy. With this higher income, the State was able not only to cover ordinary and extraordinary expenses, but also to strengthen the sinking fund, which reduced national debt.

Important Financial Laws

One of the most significant reforms was the Law of Budgetary Accounts, passed on February 28th, 1904 and applied from February 1st, 1905. This law replaced the earlier one from 1885. Its main purpose was to provide stronger control over State expenditure and to remove the causes that had previously disturbed the balance of the national budget.

By introducing modern financial rules, the government ensured that spending was more efficient, transparent, and accountable to the people’s representatives.

The combination of careful financial oversight, economic growth, and new laws created a period of financial stability in Bulgaria. The achievements of 1905, with record revenues and stronger budget control, marked an important step toward a more modern and reliable financial system for the Principality.

Rules for Contracting State Loans

In Bulgaria, no State loan can be made without the consent of the National Assembly. This ensures that the country does not fall into debt without the approval of the people’s representatives. If the Government believes that borrowing money is absolutely necessary to cover extraordinary expenses while the National Assembly is not in session, the Assembly must be called into an extraordinary session immediately.

However, if serious obstacles prevent the immediate convocation of the Assembly, the Prince, with the advice of the Council of Ministers, may authorize a loan. This loan, however, cannot exceed three million francs. Even in this case, the approval of the National Assembly must be obtained in its next session.

Similarly, the Prince has the power to approve an emergency expenditure of up to one million francs for needs not covered in the national budget. This also requires later confirmation by the Assembly. These rules protect the country’s finances from being used without accountability Istanbul Tours Guide.

The Closure of the Budget

At the end of every financial year, the Budget must be closed through a special law passed by the National Assembly. On this occasion, the Minister of Finance presents a detailed financial report to both the National Assembly and the High Court of Accounts. This report describes the overall financial situation of the country during the year and how public funds have been used.

The High Court of Accounts

The High Court of Accounts plays a vital role in ensuring financial transparency. It is an independent institution with a semi-judicial character, meaning it has both administrative and judicial powers. Its main duty is to carefully control and supervise State finances.

The Court is composed of a president, six councillors, and many reporters and accountants. These officials review the financial actions of the Government, making sure that everything is legal and correctly managed.

Importantly, the president and councillors are appointed by royal decree, but only after being proposed by the National Assembly. The Assembly alone has the authority to revoke them. This guarantees that the Court remains independent from the executive branch and accountable to the representatives of the people.

These financial safeguards show how Bulgaria’s Constitution sought to prevent misuse of public money. By requiring the approval of the National Assembly for loans and expenditures, and by giving oversight to the High Court of Accounts, the system ensured that the nation’s wealth was managed responsibly and transparently.

The Grand National Assembly

The Grand National Assembly of Bulgaria has the same structure as the ordinary National Assembly. Its members are elected in the same way and represent the people through a system of deputies. The main difference is the number of deputies. In a Grand National Assembly, the number of members is twice as many as in the ordinary Assembly. This means that every 20,000 inhabitants send two deputies instead of one.

The Grand National Assembly is a special body and has the power to decide only on matters for which it has been specifically convened. It is not a permanent institution but is called only in exceptional and important cases.

When the Grand National Assembly is Convened

The Grand National Assembly is called in the following situations:

Territorial Changes – To decide on questions of exchanging or giving away part of the territory of the Principality.

Revision of the Constitution – To make changes or improvements to the Constitution.

Succession to the Throne – To elect a new Prince when the reigning family becomes extinct and there are no descendants who can inherit the throne.

Regency – To appoint regents when the heir to the throne is underage.

Foreign Authority – To authorize the Prince to accept the government of another State, if such a case arises Istanbul Tours Guide.

These duties show that the Grand National Assembly is reserved for major national decisions that affect the future of the country.

The State Budget

Every year, the State Budget must be submitted to the legislative Assembly for approval. The budget is carefully examined chapter by chapter. The Assembly has the power to reject or modify any chapter, but it must always give clear reasons for its decision.

In urgent situations where the National Assembly cannot be convened in time, the previous year’s budget remains in force. However, this is only valid if the Assembly later approves it in its next session. In such cases, the ministers share joint responsibility for the expenditures made.

Importance of These Institutions

Both the Grand National Assembly and the State Budget play a central role in Bulgaria’s governance. The Grand Assembly ensures that the most critical constitutional and territorial matters are decided collectively, while the budget guarantees that public money is spent legally and responsibly. Together, they safeguard both the political stability and the financial order of the country.

Powers of the Ordinary National Assembly

The ordinary National Assembly of Bulgaria has clearly defined powers according to the Constitution. These powers are divided into administrative and legislative functions.

Administrative Powers

The National Assembly manages its own internal affairs. It elects its officers, including a president, two vice-presidents, secretaries, and questors. These officers are responsible for overseeing the proper functioning of the Assembly.

The Assembly also sets its internal regulations and the order of its work. Debates and votes in the Assembly are usually public, ensuring transparency and accountability. However, if a sufficient number of deputies request it, the Assembly may sit behind closed doors to discuss sensitive matters privately.

Legislative Powers

The National Assembly shares legislative authority with the Prince. This means that both the Assembly and the Crown can initiate new laws.

Deputies’ Rights: Every deputy has the right to make propositions and introduce bills, provided they are supported by one-fourth of the members present Istanbul Day Tours.

Amendments: The Assembly may amend bills and propositions introduced by the Government.

Interpellations: Deputies can question individual ministers or the entire Government about their actions or policies. This process, called interpellation, allows the Assembly to hold the executive accountable.

Oversight and Inquiries

The Assembly has the power to appoint commissions of inquiry to investigate the conduct of the Government. It can also submit special addresses to the Prince, usually in response to the Throne Speech, which outlines the state of the country and the Government’s plans.

Through these addresses, deputies can express their opinions and concerns regarding proposed bills, government measures, or the general conduct of the administration. This ensures that the National Assembly plays an active role in guiding public policy and safeguarding the interests of the Bulgarian people.

Verification of Election Results

The National Assembly is responsible for verifying the results of elections. It is the sole authority to judge whether elections have been conducted legally and correctly. The Assembly has the power to confirm or annul the results, ensuring that only proper and lawful elections determine the deputies.

Who Can Vote

All male Bulgarian subjects who have reached the age of majority and enjoy full civil and political rights are allowed to vote. In addition, naturalised foreigners—those who have legally obtained Bulgarian citizenship—also have the right to vote.

Electors must be registered and provided with an electoral card, which is used to cast their vote in secret ballot elections. This system ensures fairness and transparency in the democratic process.

Who Can Be Elected

To be elected as a deputy to the National Assembly, a Bulgarian subject must:

Be at least thirty years old.

Be able to read and write.

Have full civil and political rights, meaning they have not been legally deprived of them.

Naturalised foreigners may also become deputies, but only if they have resided in Bulgaria for at least fifteen years after naturalisation. This period may be reduced to three years by special law Istanbul Day Tours.

A deputy represents every 20,000 inhabitants, and each mandate lasts five years.

Rights and Protections of Deputies

The Constitution guarantees complete freedom of opinion for all deputies. They may express their views and vote according to their conscience, without fear of interference.

Deputies also enjoy personal inviolability:

They cannot be imprisoned for debt five days before the opening of a session or while the session is ongoing.

They cannot be arrested or prosecuted for crimes during the same period, except in cases of the most serious offenses. Even then, their arrest requires the approval of the National Assembly.

These protections ensure that deputies can perform their duties freely and without intimidation, maintaining the integrity of Bulgaria’s parliamentary system.

Voting Process

Voting in Bulgaria is done by secret ballot to protect the privacy of each elector. The ballot-box is locked with three keys: one key remains with the president of the returning bureau, and the other two with the members of the bureau.

Before voting, the elector must show his electoral card, which is checked against the electoral list. The vote, which must be folded in four, is handed to the president, who places it in the ballot-box without opening it.

Role of the Returning Bureau President

The president of the returning bureau has full authority over the police and army forces in the electoral district to maintain order during the polling. Voting takes place from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m.

After the polling ends, the president appoints two electors to help verify the results. Candidates and their agents are allowed to observe this process.

Verification of Votes

First, the electoral cards are counted and compared with the marginal notes on the electoral lists. If there is a discrepancy, the electoral lists take priority, and the incident is recorded.

Next, the ballot-box is opened. Votes that are not properly filled are not counted, but they are included in the official records.

The result of the counting is written in a special report, signed by the members of the returning bureau, the verifiers, and the candidates or their agents. This ensures transparency and accountability Istanbul Day Tours.

Reporting and Proclamation of Results

Two copies of the report are made:

First copy – sent to the president of the District Court, along with all ballots, electoral lists, and cards, sealed by the municipality.

Second copy – sent to the sub-prefect.

The District Court, without opening the parcel of ballots, checks the majority required and proclaims the candidates who received the highest number of votes as the deputies.

This system ensures that elections are fair, transparent, and carefully monitored, giving confidence to both electors and candidates in the democratic process.

Election Rules and Protection of Electors

No electors may be called to serve in the military or any other state service during the five days before the election or on the day of polling. Anyone who has already been called must be released immediately. This ensures that every elector is free to vote without interference.

Electoral Cards

Every elector must be provided with an electoral card by the municipality. Without this card, no one can vote.

The Ministry of the Interior sends special cards to all communes.

The communal authorities must fill in each card with the elector’s name, surname, age, and other necessary details.

The card also indicates the election for which it is issued and the voting section where the elector must vote.

These cards must be distributed at least ten days before the election.

Electors who were accidentally omitted can apply to the Justice of Peace, who is authorized to issue replacement electoral cards. The Justice of Peace also writes a report against the defaulting mayor, who can face criminal prosecution Istanbul Day Tours.

Candidate Requirements

Every candidate must have the support of at least twenty electors, and their names must be submitted to the District Court. Candidates may be represented at each polling place by an elector who ensures their interests are respected during the voting process.

Returning Bureau

The returning bureau is responsible for managing the voting process at each polling station. It is composed of:

President – must be a judge.

Four other members – including:

one member of the departmental council,

one mayor,

and two primary school teachers.

Ten days before the election, the Courts of Appeal select the presidents by lot from the Court of Appeal, district courts, and Justices of Peace.

The other members are chosen by the District Court in the same way.

This system ensures that the election process is fair, organized, and transparent, giving all electors the opportunity to vote freely and safely.

National Assembly of Bulgaria

The Bulgarian people participate in the government through the National Assembly, which is composed of deputies elected by the citizens. The National Assembly plays a key role in representing the people and making laws.

There are two types of National Assemblies: the Ordinary National Assembly and the Grand National Assembly.

Ordinary National Assembly

The Ordinary National Assembly meets every year from October 15th to December 15th. In cases of urgent matters or when important questions require quick decisions, the Assembly may be called into an extraordinary session. During these sessions, deputies discuss laws, budgets, and other national issues Istanbul Day Tours.

Election of Deputies

Deputies for the National Assembly are elected according to a special law. The election process is carefully organized to ensure fairness and transparency.

Electoral lists are prepared and published by special commissions of the municipal councils.

Citizens have the right to correct any mistakes or omissions in these lists.

Municipal councils investigate all claims, and their decisions can be appealed to the Justice of Peace or the District Court.

Further appeals can be made to the High Court of Cassation, which has the authority to annul lower court decisions if necessary.

All electoral disputes are exempt from stamp duties, making the process easier and more accessible.

Electoral Districts and Election Dates

For the purpose of elections, the country is divided into special districts. The number and boundaries of these districts are defined by a special law.

The date of the elections is set by a royal decree, which must be published at least one month before the polling day. This ensures that all citizens are informed in advance and have the opportunity to participate.

Role and Importance

Through the National Assembly, the people of Bulgaria exercise their right to influence government decisions. The Assembly represents the voice of the nation, debates laws, and supervises the actions of the executive branch. Both ordinary and extraordinary sessions ensure that the government remains responsive and accountable to its citizens.

Restoration of the Constitution

The absolutist regime established in 1881 did not last the full seven years. On September 6, 1883, the Constitution of Timova was fully restored. Since that date, the constitution has been in continuous force, serving as the legal foundation of Bulgarian governance.

Attempts at Constitutional Revision

There were only two partial revisions of the constitution:

First Attempt (1883) – Shortly after the restoration of constitutional government, there was an effort to introduce changes. However, the attempt failed because the legal conditions and procedures required by the constitution were not fully observed.

Second Attempt (1893) – The second attempt at revision was more successful. The fourth Grand National Assembly of Timova, on May 15, 1893, amended several articles: 6, 38, 59, 86, 114, 115, 125, 126, 139, 141, 144, and 161. These amendments helped update and clarify certain aspects of governance without undermining the overall framework of the constitution Istanbul Day Tour.

Structure of the Bulgarian Constitution

The Bulgarian Constitution contains 169 clauses, organized into 22 chapters, which are further subdivided into sections. The chapters cover the following topics:

Territory of the Principality – defining the land and borders of Bulgaria.

Prerogatives of the Prince – outlining the powers and limits of the monarchy.

Residence of the Prince – specifying the official residence.

Coat of Arms, Seal, and Flag – symbols of national identity.

Succession to the Throne – rules for hereditary succession.

Majority, Regency, and Guardianship – provisions for minority kings and regents.

Accession and Oath – ceremonies and legal formalities for assuming the throne.

Civil List of the Prince – finances and household of the royal family.

Religion – defining the state religion and religious freedoms.

Laws – legislative processes and legal authority.

State Properties – management of national resources.

Citizens of Bulgaria – rights and duties of citizens.

National Representation – structure and role of the legislative body.

Ordinary National Assembly – organization and functioning.

Duties of the National Assembly – legislative responsibilities.

Introducing and Examining Bills – procedures for new laws.

Budget – preparation and approval of the state budget.

State Loans – regulations on borrowing and public debt.

Convocation of the National Assembly – rules for calling meetings.

Grand National Assembly – powers and organization of the special assembly.

Supreme Public Institutions – Council of Ministers and ministries.

Revising or Altering the Constitution – legal procedures for amendments.

The Bulgarian Constitution of 1879 has proven resilient and adaptable, surviving political crises and guiding the Principality through decades of change. Its clear structure and comprehensive coverage of governance, rights, and national symbols ensured the stability and continuity of modern Bulgarian statehood.

Challenges After the Constitution

The new Bulgarian constitution was like a fragile ship entrusted to inexperienced sailors, navigating through a stormy sea. From the very beginning, it faced numerous internal and external dangers, reflecting the turbulent political climate of the country. Its history is closely tied to the history of Bulgaria during the last quarter of the 19th century.

Suspension of the Constitution

In 1881, following a coup d’état, the constitution was temporarily suspended. The law of July 1–13 granted the Prince extraordinary powers for seven years. Under this law, the Prince could:

Issue decrees with the force of law

Create new institutions

Administer the country without the immediate collaboration of the National Assembly

At the end of the seven years, the Prince was required to call a grand National Assembly to revise the constitution, taking into account the experience gained and the newly established institutions Istanbul Day Tour.

Provisional vs. Final Constitution

Originally, the Russian government intended the constitution to be provisional, to be revised after a few years of practical experience. However, the Constituent Assembly decided to create a permanent constitution. This decision meant that the Organic Statute remained the final legal foundation of Bulgaria, even after temporary suspensions.

Creation of the State Council

Under the law granting the Prince extraordinary powers, the Chamber of Deputies was immediately dissolved. One of the most important tasks of the new regime was to establish a State Council, which shared legislative powers with the Prince. Its composition included:

Eight members elected by the nation

Four members appointed by the Prince

Ministers, who had a consultative voice only

Although the Prince had extraordinary and almost unlimited authority, he promised to consult the representatives of the people whenever the country’s interest required it. This promise was an early step toward balancing autocratic power with popular representation.

The period following the adoption of the constitution was one of political experimentation and adaptation. The temporary suspension of the constitution, the creation of the State Council, and the extraordinary powers of the Prince reflected the challenges of establishing modern governance in a newly independent Bulgaria. Despite these difficulties, the foundations laid during this period helped shape the evolution of Bulgarian political life in the decades to come.

Adoption of the Constitution

After careful debate and review, the Constituent Assembly introduced several important alterations to the original draft of the Organic Statute. These changes affected the title of the bill and most of its key provisions. The Assembly chose the new title: “Constitution of the Bulgarian State.”

Key Changes Introduced

Several major reforms were made:

The principle of a State Council was rejected.

The legislative body—the National Assembly—was given the right to initiate laws, increasing its power and independence.

The composition of the Assembly was made uniform. Previously, some members were appointed or included by virtue of their office, and property-based voting requirements applied. These restrictions were abolished, and all members were to be elected by universal suffrage Istanbul Tour Guide.

These changes ensured a more democratic and representative system, giving the Bulgarian people a direct role in choosing their lawmakers.

Passing of the Constitution

The constitution, with these amendments, was formally passed on April 16, 1879. It was countersigned by:

All deputies of the Constituent Assembly

The Imperial Russian Commissary

Ottoman delegates

Representatives of the Great Powers

The limited role of the Ottoman delegates and the Great Powers reflected the fact that, under the Treaty of Berlin, they had already collaborated with the Russian Commissary in preparing the draft. Their abstention also indicated that the mission of the provisional government was practically complete.

Significance and Longevity

The adoption of the constitution marked the beginning of modern Bulgarian governance. Over the next twenty-five years, it survived numerous crises and political challenges, demonstrating its resilience and adaptability.

One of its greatest merits is its longevity, which is impressive given the turbulent circumstances in which it was created. Its history shows that a well-crafted constitution, grounded in liberal principles and popular representation, can endure even in difficult times.

The Constitution of the Bulgarian State laid the foundation for modern democracy in Bulgaria. By empowering the National Assembly, abolishing restrictive voting rules, and ensuring universal suffrage, it created a system capable of adapting to future challenges. Its survival and influence over decades reflect the wisdom and foresight of the Constituent Assembly and its leaders.

Examination of the Draft

After the Organic Statute was submitted, it was referred to a committee of fifteen members. Their task was to study the draft carefully and report back to the Constituent Assembly.

The debates that followed the committee’s report revealed that Bulgaria already had capable men who could guide the country’s political future. These discussions were intense and showed a high level of knowledge and understanding of governance.

Influential Figures in the Assembly

The principal speakers in the debates were mostly young men who had recently returned from European universities. They brought with them:

Knowledge of European law and politics.

Personal observations from their stay in European capitals.

Experiences of parliamentary life in countries like France, Belgium, and Serbia.

Unlike the traditional elite, most of these men were elected through popular suffrage, not born into privileged positions. They represented the ideas of civilisation, culture, and liberal values in an Assembly that still included many Turkish rayas Istanbul Tour Guide.

Even at this early stage, political tendencies were emerging that would later divide Bulgaria into distinct political parties.

The Committee’s Proposal

The committee proposed changes that were seen as more conservative than the original draft. Instead of a State Council, the committee suggested creating a Senate.

They also introduced property-based qualifications for voters. Citizenship alone did not give political rights. To vote or to become a member of the Assembly, a person had to meet specific financial requirements, which were especially strict for candidates.

These measures were designed to limit the influence of ordinary citizens and maintain control in the hands of wealthier individuals.

Rejection of the Committee’s Report

The Assembly rejected the committee’s report. Instead, members decided to consider the original Russian draft, discussing it point by point. This approach ensured that the final constitution would be more liberal and representative than the committee’s conservative proposals.

The debates on the draft show that even in its early stages, Bulgaria had politically aware leaders capable of shaping a modern constitutional government. The rejection of restrictive proposals in favor of the Russian draft laid the foundation for a more inclusive and democratic political system, balancing local traditions with European liberal ideas.

Liberal Changes in the Constitution

The original draft of the Organic Statute gave very few rights to the legislative body. Most of the legislative initiative—the power to propose new laws—was reserved for the Prince and the Government. Members of the National Assembly had little ability to create new laws or influence policy.

The Constituent Assembly played a key role in changing this. Many of the liberal institutions that now form part of the Bulgarian constitution were introduced by members of the Assembly. These changes were significant and gave the legislative body more independence and influence than originally planned.

Composition of the National Assembly

The draft gave the National Assembly more the character of a senate than a popular assembly. Not all members were to be elected by the people. Some were appointed by the Prince, while others were included by virtue of their office: the Exarch, bishops, and presidents of law courts all automatically became members Istanbul Tour Guide.

The State Council was another important institution proposed in the draft. Its responsibilities were:

Advising the Government in preparing bills.

Acting as the supreme administrative court.

Settling disputes between the judiciary and administrative organs.

Authorising extraordinary expenses and communal loans.

Approving expropriations for public utility.

Ensuring the observance of the constitution.

This made the State Council a powerful body, closely linked to the government.

The Constituent Assembly

The Constituent Assembly that reviewed the draft had 231 members. Its composition was as follows:

89 members elected by popular suffrage (one deputy per 10,000 male inhabitants).

21 members appointed by the Imperial Commissary, including 11 Mahommedans.

5 members representing various societies.

11 members representing the clergy: 9 Orthodox, 1 mufti, and 1 rabbi.

105 members were high officials, including presidents of law courts and departmental or municipal councils.

This mix ensured that different social, religious, and administrative groups were represented in the Assembly, giving it more authority and legitimacy.

Thanks to the initiative of the Constituent Assembly, Bulgaria’s constitution became more democratic and balanced than the original draft. The Assembly expanded the powers of legislators, ensured representation of different communities, and strengthened the rule of law. These reforms laid the foundation of modern Bulgarian governance and established a system that could adapt to the needs of a newly independent state.

Challenges During the Transitional Period

After the liberation of Bulgaria, the country entered a transitional period in which old Ottoman structures were replaced by modern European institutions. The Russians, who were in charge of establishing the new government, faced enormous difficulties in carrying out their task.

The main challenge was the ongoing state of war. Russian troops were still fighting to push the Ottoman army southwards, and the local population was often unsettled by the violence and uncertainty. The abolition of the former administration could not happen everywhere at the same time; it had to follow the progress of the Russian army, which advanced slowly and at great cost.

At first, the work of creating a new administration was like a “Tower of Babel.” Officials struggled to coordinate the various parts of the system, which were built from different, incompatible materials. The machinery of government was clumsy and inefficient, and only the efforts of highly skilled administrators kept it running Istanbul Tour Guide.

Preparation of the New Constitution

In addition to managing daily administration, the provisional government had the task of preparing a new constitution for Bulgaria. This task was assigned to the Russian professor Gradovsky, who was assisted by General Domontovitz.

The resulting document, written in Russian and titled the “Organic Statute,” was submitted to the Constituent Assembly at Tărnovo on February 10–22, 1879 by the Commissary-General, Dondoukoff-Korsakoff.

Sources and Influences

Very little is known about the specific sources used by Professor Gradovsky. However, it is clear that he was guided in part by the Treaty of Berlin, which had already defined the basic structure of Bulgaria’s government.

In addition, Gradovsky was strongly influenced by the Serbian and Belgian constitutions, which were examples of modern European governance at the time. He also drew inspiration from Russian communal institutions, particularly in giving autonomy to local communes. This allowed local communities to manage their own affairs within the broader framework of the new Principality.

The transitional period in Bulgaria was marked by chaos, war, and administrative challenges. Despite these difficulties, the Russians laid the foundations for a modern civil government. The preparation of the Organic Statute combined international guidance with local traditions and set the stage for Bulgaria’s first independent constitutional government.

Religious and Minority Courts

Separate Tribunals for Different Faiths

Under the new administrative system in Bulgaria after 1878, different religious communities were allowed to have their own tribunals. This included the Orthodox Christians, Mahommedans (Muslims), and Jews. Each of these groups could settle certain civil matters according to their own traditions.

The idea was to respect the diverse customs and traditions of the population while introducing a modern system of justice. However, plans to create commercial courts in major trade centers were never fully implemented.

Military Courts

The military courts continued to function as they had since the proclamation of July 1, 1877. Their jurisdiction and procedures were maintained, ensuring that military matters were handled separately from civil cases Istanbul Tour Guide.

Tolerance Towards the Mahommedans

The new government showed great tolerance toward the Mahommedans, who had recently been the ruling class under Ottoman rule. Several measures made this tolerance clear:

The official language of the courts was Bulgarian or Russian, which the Turkish population often could not understand.

The courts were instructed to respect local and national customs until new laws could be prepared.

These policies were designed to show that the new regime was different from the previous Ottoman system, which had been strict and intolerant toward the Christian population.

Special Turkish Civil Courts

To implement these principles, the Provisional Rules allowed the creation of special Turkish civil courts. These courts were distinct from the traditional religious courts that the Mahommedans had under Ottoman rule.

The Mahommedan courts had the same jurisdiction as the ordinary courts when both parties in a case were Muslims.

If the parties were of different nationalities, the case was heard jointly by the Mahommedan court and the ordinary court. The oldest member of the courts would act as the presiding judge.

This system ensured that justice respected both national and religious diversity, while gradually introducing the population to the new civil procedures of the Principality.

The creation of religious and minority courts was a key feature of early post-liberation Bulgaria. It allowed communities to maintain their traditions while ensuring fairness in civil matters. By combining Councils of Elders, ordinary courts, and special Mahommedan tribunals, the Provisional Rules created a flexible and inclusive system of justice that recognized the diverse population of the Principality.

The Appointment of Prince Dondoukoff-Korsakoff

After the Treaty of San Stefano, Russia was responsible for organising the civil government of Bulgaria. The choice fell on Prince Dondoukoff-Korsakoff, who was appointed as Commissary-General. Originally, he was given two years to complete this important task. However, the Treaty of Berlin (1878) shortened this period to only nine months, making his work much more difficult.

The First Administrative Council

To begin his mission, Korsakoff established an administrative council, which can be considered the first form of civil government in Bulgaria after the war. This council consisted of six members, each in charge of an important department:

Commissary’s chancery and diplomatic correspondence

Military affairs

Interior administration

Justice

Finance

Public instruction and religions

This was a significant step forward, as it gave Bulgaria its first organised governing body in modern times.

Division of Northern and Southern Bulgaria

For practical purposes, Northern Bulgaria was provisionally divided into sixteen departments, which were further subdivided into thirty-two districts Istanbul Daily Tour.

Southern Bulgaria, however, was treated differently. Known as Eastern Roumelia, it was given a special status under the Treaty of Berlin and placed under a separate administrative arrangement.

Judicial Reforms and the Provisional Rules

One of the most important achievements during this period was the reform of the judiciary system. The chief of the judiciary section, Lucanoff, created a commission to prepare regulations for justice. The result of their work was the document called “Provisional Rules for the Organisation of Justice in Bulgaria.”

These rules were officially proclaimed at Plovdiv on August 24, 1878. They introduced a completely new system of justice, replacing the old Ottoman institutions, most of which existed only in name.

Structure of the New Judiciary

Under the new rules, justice was placed in the hands of Councils of Elders and various courts.

Councils of Elders were created in every commune, giving local communities a voice in justice and administration.

Ordinary courts included district courts and departmental courts, the latter acting as courts of appeal.

Exceptional jurisdictions were also recognised. These included administrative, military, religious, and Mahommedan courts, each with specific responsibilities.

The work of Prince Dondoukoff-Korsakoff and his council laid the foundations of Bulgaria’s modern administration and judiciary system. Although his time was limited by the Treaty of Berlin, the establishment of councils, departments, and new courts marked a decisive break from the Ottoman past and gave Bulgaria the framework for its future as an independent principality.

The Condition of Turkish Provinces

The description given earlier about the political and social life of the Ottoman provinces remained true even in the late nineteenth century. Many regions, and especially Macedonia, continued to show the same lack of modern administration, weak institutions, and simple rural life.

This was also the state in which the Russians found Bulgaria in 1877, during the Russo-Turkish War. The country had no proper system of administration, and most of the Ottoman structures that existed were inefficient and outdated.

The Arrival of the Russians in 1877

As soon as the Russian army crossed the Danube River, their leaders began to think about how to create a better system of administration for the Bulgarian lands. The Russians did not see their role only as liberators from Ottoman control but also as organisers of a new civil structure.

On this subject, there exists an important report prepared by the Russian Imperial Commissary in Bulgaria. This report was later read before the Constituent Assembly at Tărnovo, where the foundations of modern Bulgaria were discussed Istanbul Daily Tour.

A Special Administrative Commission

The reorganisation of Bulgaria was not left to chance. The task was entrusted to a special commission that accompanied the Russian troops. This commission was placed under the direct authority of the Commander-in-Chief of the Russian armies.

As early as July 7, 1877, the Imperial Commissary presented to the Commander-in-Chief a scheme for the civil organisation of the Bulgarian provinces. The sandjaks (large districts) and kazas (smaller districts) were to be governed under this new plan. At the same time, the governors were instructed to keep in operation the few institutions that had survived from Ottoman rule.

Difficulties During the War

However, in the turmoil of war, this project of reform was often forgotten or delayed. The task of rebuilding and reorganising an entire country while battles were still being fought proved extremely difficult. The results achieved at first were limited and not very encouraging.

For this reason, it was impossible to speak of a complete administrative organisation before the Treaty of San Stefano in 1878.

The Treaty of San Stefano and Russian Role

According to one of the clauses of this treaty, Russia appointed a Commissary-General. His official mission was to create and supervise the civil government of Bulgaria. This marked the true beginning of Bulgaria’s modern administrative structure.

The Russian intervention in 1877–1878 was not only a military campaign but also the starting point for a new political and administrative order in Bulgaria. While the process was difficult during wartime, the Treaty of San Stefano gave Russia the authority to lay the foundations of a civil government, which later shaped the future Principality of Bulgaria.

Turkey and the Congress of Paris

At the Congress of Paris in 1856, Turkey was admitted into the concert of European Powers. This meant that the Ottoman Empire was recognized as part of the European political system. In order to show that it was worthy of this new status, Turkey promised to carry out several law reforms.

These reforms were inspired mainly by France, from which Turkey borrowed a criminal code and a commercial code. This was an important step, because it marked the beginning of a slow transition from purely religious law toward a mixed system of religious and secular law.

Creation of Civil Tribunals

One of the most significant changes was the establishment of civil tribunals, called Mahkeme-Nizamiye, or law courts. These courts were introduced for the first time in the Ottoman Empire after the Congress of Paris.

In 1867, during the governorship of Midhat Pasha, these tribunals were also created in the Vilayet of the Danube, which included the Bulgarian lands. The new courts included both courts of first instance and courts of appeal, each made up of three or four judges Istanbul Daily Tour.

However, their jurisdiction was not clearly defined. Moreover, their usefulness was limited because the traditional cadis—religious judges who applied Islamic law—kept their authority. Since the population was strongly attached to the Koran and trusted the cadis, most people continued to bring their cases before them. As a result, the new law courts were largely ignored by both the public and the government.

Lack of Separation of Powers

The principle of separation of powers—which is central to modern political systems—was unknown in the Ottoman Empire. Administrative authorities acted not only as administrators but also as judges. Police officials served the role of assize courts, meaning they could judge cases and carry out punishments immediately, without any real trial or legal procedure.

This system often led to arbitrary decisions and weakened the possibility of fair justice.

Social and Economic Conditions

Public life in the Bulgarian provinces under Ottoman rule was almost non-existent. The daily customs of the population were simple and traditional. There were no developed means of communication, and industry was almost unknown. Commerce was very small in scale, and agriculture was the main occupation of the Christian peasants, known as the rayas.

Given the low level of education and the limited moral and intellectual development of the time, the absence of a more advanced political organisation seemed to match the general state of society. In other words, the lack of strong institutions reflected the overall underdeveloped conditions of the population.

The reforms after the Congress of Paris showed Turkey’s attempt to modernize and align with Europe, but in practice, traditional institutions remained dominant. The cadis, the absence of separation of powers, and the poor social and economic conditions all limited the impact of these reforms in Bulgaria and the wider Ottoman Empire.

Political and Administrative Organisation

Legislative Power in Medieval Bulgaria

In the early Bulgarian state, legislative power was shared between the king and the council of bishops. This combination of royal and religious authority reflected the strong influence of both the monarchy and the church.

The main sources of law during this period included:

Chrysobulles – royal decrees issued by the king.

Decisions of church councils – rulings that dealt with matters of faith and community life.

Prefectoral ordinances – orders given by provincial governors.

Judicial decisions – rulings from the law courts that applied and interpreted existing laws.

These sources of law created a framework for governance, though they were not always consistent or systematic.

Bulgarian Lands under Ottoman Rule

When Bulgaria fell under Turkish domination, it became part of the Vilayet of the Danube, one of the provinces of the Ottoman Empire. In this respect, Bulgaria’s fate was very similar to that of other Balkan territories under Ottoman rule Istanbul Daily Tour.

Until the Treaty of Paris in 1856, the Ottoman Empire had only a rudimentary political organisation. Being a theocratic state, all political and administrative authority came from the Caliph, who was seen as the representative of the Prophet Muhammad.

The Role of the Koran and Cadis

In the Ottoman system, the Koran served as both civil and criminal law. Ministers of religion were responsible for ensuring obedience to its commandments and punishing those who broke them.

Each parish or district had a cadi, who acted as judge. The cadi was appointed by the religious authorities and held broad powers. He could judge both civil and criminal cases, often without any formal rules of procedure. In essence, the cadi applied the limited legal principles of the Koran according to his own interpretation.

When disputes were more complicated, the cadi could consult with two respected notables of the parish, although their role was only advisory.

Higher Religious Authority

In certain special cases, the decisions of a local cadi could be reviewed by the Sheik-ul-Islam of Constantinople, the highest religious tribunal in the Ottoman Empire. This institution acted as a final authority in religious and legal matters, ensuring that local rulings were consistent with Islamic law.

The political and legal system in Bulgaria changed dramatically under Ottoman rule. From a kingdom where laws came from both king and church, Bulgaria became a province governed through the religious principles of Islam. Authority was concentrated in the hands of the cadis and, ultimately, the Caliph in Constantinople. This system limited local autonomy and placed the Bulgarian population under the same religious-legal framework as all other Ottoman subjects in the Balkans.

The Feudal System in Bulgaria

Royal Power and Titles

Under the feudal system, the real authority of the king became weaker, but his titles and symbols of power grew in dignity. The king was addressed as “Caesar” or “Imperator,” showing his prestige in both local and international affairs. He sent and received ambassadors, wore a purple mantle and a crown, and carried a sceptre as symbols of sovereignty.

The succession to the throne followed the law of primogeniture, which meant that the eldest son inherited the crown. Women were excluded by the Salic Law, so only men could rule. If the king had no children, the throne passed to his eldest brother. During the minority of a king, the queen mother acted as regent. If a royal family line became extinct, the noblemen (boliars) had the authority to elect one of their peers as the new ruler, thus establishing a new dynasty Istanbul Daily Tour.

Nobility and Byzantine Influence

The boliars held all important state functions, making the political system an exclusive privilege of the nobility. The entire administration of the kingdom was modelled on the Byzantine Empire, which served as a cultural and political example.

Among the highest state dignitaries were:

The despot, usually a close relative of the king.

The sebastocrat, often the king’s brother.

Other officials such as the chamberlain, the minister of finance, and several dignitaries responsible for different state services.

Each province was governed by a prefect, or “ban,” who acted as the king’s representative and exercised both administrative and judicial authority.

Social Classes

Society under feudal Bulgaria was divided into three main classes:

The nobility and the clergy – who held power, land, and privileges.

Tradesmen and artisans – who lived mainly in towns and engaged in commerce or crafts.

The peasants (often referred to as pariahs) – who formed the largest part of the population.

Peasants were allowed to own land, but they were bound to it and could not freely leave. They were obliged to pay taxes and provide services to the upper classes, which kept them in a state of dependency.

The feudal system in Bulgaria reflected both local traditions and Byzantine influence. While the king’s symbolic authority remained strong, real power lay in the hands of the boliars. The division of society into nobles, tradesmen, and peasants created a rigid structure, with the majority of people tied to the land and heavily taxed. This system ensured stability for the ruling elite but limited freedom for ordinary people, shaping the social and political life of medieval Bulgaria.

Political and Administrative Organisation

The Constitution of the Bulgarian Principality

It is still too early to write a full constitutional history of modern Bulgaria, since the Principality was established only a few decades before the beginning of the 20th century. The modern history of Bulgaria truly began with the arrival of the first Bulgarian Prince in the late 19th century. Between the time of the medieval Bulgarian kingdoms and the creation of the Principality, there was a long break of several centuries under foreign rule. Because of this, there is no direct political or institutional link between the old kingdoms and the Bulgaria of modern times.

The Organic Statute, which regulates political life in the Principality, was created in a short period and not entirely by Bulgarians themselves. The Great Powers of Europe, when they recognized the independence of Bulgaria, also decided what form the new government should take. They laid down the essential principles of public law for the Principality. Thus, Bulgaria’s constitutional system was not only the result of its national struggle but also the outcome of international agreements Istanbul Tour Guides.

Ancient Bulgarian Kingdom

Very little is known about the detailed political organisation of the ancient Bulgarian state. In its earliest form, the government appears to have been aristocratic. The king was given absolute authority, but he was assisted by a council of six great noblemen, called boliars. From this title comes the word “boliarstvo,” meaning nobility.

The royal court included many pages, equerries, and lesser nobles who came from different regions of the kingdom. The noblemen and the clergy together shared political power, often leaving little influence to the common people.

Social Conditions in the Past

Another important feature of the old Bulgarian kingdom was the existence of serfdom. From the very beginning, peasants worked the land under the authority of nobles and landowners. This system gave great power to the aristocracy and the church, but limited the freedom of the majority of the population.

The study of Bulgaria’s political organisation shows a sharp contrast between the ancient kingdom and the modern Principality. While the old system was based on aristocracy, serfdom, and the influence of the church, the modern Bulgarian state began under a constitutional framework created with the help of foreign powers. Although young, this system laid the foundation for Bulgaria’s political development in the years to come.

Languages Spoken in Bulgaria

Variety of Languages

At the beginning of the 20th century, Bulgaria was not only a land of ethnic diversity but also of many different languages. The census records show that the majority of the people spoke Bulgarian, but many other languages were used in daily life. This reflected both the history of the Balkans and the presence of minority groups who had lived in the region for centuries.

For example, there were:

German speakers – about 5,000 people (2,339 men and 2,682 women).

French speakers – around 643 people.

Italian speakers – over 800 people.

Romanian speakers – more than 83,000 people.

Tzigan (Roma) speakers – about 95,000 people.

Albanian speakers – around 1,300 people.

Hungarian speakers – nearly 900 people.

English speakers – just over 100 people.

Arab and Persian speakers, and a small number of people using other non-Slavic languages.

This wide range of vernacular languages shows how connected Bulgaria was to neighboring states and to the wider world.

Religions in the Principality

Orthodox Majority

Religion also played a central role in Bulgarian society. The census showed that the great majority of the population were Eastern Orthodox Christians. Most of the people who spoke Bulgarian, Russian, Serbian, or Greek belonged to this confession Istanbul Tour Guides.

Catholics and Protestants

Alongside the Orthodox, there were smaller communities of Catholics and Protestants. Many of these were linked with foreign settlers, such as Germans, Hungarians, and Italians. For example, the census recorded more than 1,200 German Catholics and a significant number of German Protestants. French and Italian settlers also contributed to the Catholic minority.

Jews, Armenians, and Muslims

Bulgaria was also home to other religious groups.

The Jewish community spoke their own dialects and mainly lived in towns.

The Armenians had both Orthodox and Catholic members.

Muslims, including Turkish and Tatar speakers, formed another important group, especially in some regions of the country.

A Diverse but United Nation

The data shows that although Bulgarians formed the majority, the Principality had many small communities with their own languages and religions. Each group contributed to the culture, economy, and traditions of the land.

The Bulgarian state, still young at the start of the 20th century, had to find ways to integrate this diversity while strengthening national identity. The coexistence of different languages and confessions shaped Bulgaria into a country with both deep local traditions and strong links to the wider world.

Family Size in Bulgaria

Large and Patriarchal Families

One of the most interesting aspects of Bulgarian society in the early 20th century is the size of families. The table of family sizes shows how many members usually lived together. A remarkable feature is the large number of big families, sometimes made up of many generations. These groups often lived under the same roof and worked on land that was owned jointly. Such families were known as patriarchal groups, where one elder, usually the father or grandfather, was the head of the household.

In earlier times, these large families were more common. However, the law of succession, which divided land among heirs, slowly reduced the number of such groups. Over time, rural properties became split among children and grandchildren, which made families smaller and more independent.

Statistics on Family Size

The census records show that while small families of one to four members were common, there were also many households with six, seven, or even more members. For example, more than 110,000 families had five members, and over 105,000 families had six members. Some households even reached 15 to 20 members, though these were rare. This demonstrates how deeply family life was connected with agriculture, where many hands were needed to work the fields Istanbul Tour Guides.

Nationalities in Bulgaria

Bulgarian Majority and Minorities

The census also recorded the nationalities living in the Principality. Bulgarians formed the vast majority, with more than 3.9 million people. Alongside them lived smaller groups such as Turks (29,037), Greeks (7,257), Romanians (2,095), Italians (1,137), and others. Foreign nationals such as Russians, Austro-Hungarians, Germans, French, Swiss, and British were also present, though in small numbers.

This diversity shows that Bulgaria, even in its early years as a modern state, had a mix of communities, some of them merchants, diplomats, or craftsmen who had settled there.

Birthplaces of the Population

Another way to view the population is by birthplace. Most people, nearly 3.9 million, were born in Bulgaria. Others came from nearby countries such as Turkey (87,474), Romania (13,542), Russia (7,341), and Serbia (4,438). A smaller number were born in countries like Austria-Hungary, Greece, Italy, Germany, and France. This mixture reflects migration patterns and the ties Bulgaria had with neighboring lands.

Languages Spoken

Vernacular Languages

Language statistics also reveal the multicultural character of the country. The majority of people spoke Bulgarian (over 3.2 million). However, many spoke Turkish (497,820), Greek (69,761), Jewish dialects (36,455), Armenian (13,494), and Tatar (16,270). Smaller groups spoke Russian, Serbian, Croatian, Polish, Czech, and other Slavic languages.

These figures highlight the linguistic richness of Bulgaria, where different traditions and cultures coexisted within one state.

At the start of the 20th century, Bulgaria had a growing population characterized by strong family ties, a clear Bulgarian majority, and many small minority communities. Large households reflected the agricultural way of life, while the presence of different nationalities and languages showed that Bulgaria was part of a wider network of peoples in the Balkans and Europe.

Population Density in Bulgaria

Average Density

If we compare the total population of Bulgaria with the total land area of the Principality, we find that there are about 39 inhabitants per square kilometre. This number shows the average density of the population. Considering the rich soil, fertile land, and natural advantages of the country, Bulgaria could easily support a population much larger than the one it had at the beginning of the 20th century.

Urban and Rural Population

The majority of Bulgarians at this time lived in the countryside, working mainly in farming and agriculture. However, the number of towns was also relatively high, with 73 towns in total. The capital city, Sofia, stood out as the largest urban centre, with 82,621 inhabitants Istanbul Tour Guides.

Other important towns included:

Plovdiv (Philippopolis) – 45,707 inhabitants

Varna – 37,417 inhabitants

Rousse (Roustchouk) – 33,632 inhabitants

Sliven – 25,027 inhabitants

Shoumen – 22,275 inhabitants

Pleven – 21,145 inhabitants

Stara Zagora – 20,788 inhabitants

These towns were not only administrative and cultural centres but also played an important role in trade and economic life.

Medium-Sized Towns

The census also recorded several towns with populations between 10,000 and 20,000 people. Some of the larger ones were Tatar-Bazardjik (17,555), Vidin (16,388), Yambol (15,741), Dobrich (15,397), and Haskovo (15,105). Others such as Razgrad, Bourgas, Sistova, and Kazanlik also belonged to this group.

Smaller Towns

In addition, there were many towns with populations ranging from 5,000 to 10,000 inhabitants. Examples include Toutrakan (9,845), Panagyurishte (9,729), Karlovo (7,812), Gabrovo (7,816), Gorna Oryahovitsa (6,819), Nova Zagora (5,879), and Nikopol (5,236). These smaller towns were still significant because they served as local centres for trade, crafts, and administration.

In summary, Bulgaria at the beginning of the 20th century had a growing and balanced population. While most people lived in rural areas, the number of towns and cities was already large compared to the size of the country. With its fertile lands and resources, Bulgaria was in a strong position to support even more people in the years ahead.

Population in Bulgaria

Regular Census of the Population

According to Bulgarian law, a census of the population is carried out at fixed times. This important responsibility is given to the Direction of Statistics, an official institution in charge of collecting and analyzing information about the people of the country. Thanks to its careful methods, the results of the census are considered very reliable.

Since the liberation of Bulgaria, every government has paid close attention to the work of the Direction of Statistics. The institution has provided valuable information that helps the state plan for the future. Its importance continues to grow as Bulgaria develops socially and economically Istanbul Tour Guides.

Role of the Direction of Statistics

The Direction of Statistics is well organized and employs trained workers who know how to gather accurate data. Because of this, the institution has detailed knowledge about different areas of national life that can be measured in numbers. These include the size of the population, economic activities, and social changes.

Census of 1905

The census taken on December 31, 1905, showed that the Principality of Bulgaria had a total population of 4,035,646 inhabitants. The following table presents the results of earlier censuses and shows how the population grew over time:

Census Year Male Population Female Population Total Population

1905 2,057,175 1,978,471 4,035,646

1900 1,909,567 1,834,716 3,744,283

1892 1,690,626 1,620,087 3,310,713

1887 1,605,389 1,548,986 3,154,375

1884 476,462 466,218 942,680*

1880 1,027,803 980,116 2,007,919

(*The figures for 1884 may cover only a part of the territory.)

Growth of the Population

From this table we can see that the population of Bulgaria grew quickly between 1880 and 1905. During this 25-year period, the number of inhabitants increased by 1,085,047 people. This rise shows the natural growth of the population, supported by better living conditions, greater stability, and the progress of the young Bulgarian state.

The steady increase also demonstrates how important accurate statistics are for understanding the development of a country. With such information, the government can make better decisions about health, education, economy, and infrastructure.

Bulgarian Sovereignty

Bulgaria’s sovereignty depends on its strength. When Bulgaria is strong, it can consider itself fully sovereign. If the country is weak, its independence is limited and it is only half-sovereign. The clauses of the Treaty of Berlin concerning Bulgaria’s government were valid only until the country achieved autonomy. They applied before and during the Tirnova Constituent Assembly and continued to be in effect until the election of the Prince.

The Constituent Assembly and the Constitution

The constituent assembly met at Tirnova from February 10 to 22, 1879. During this meeting, the assembly passed the Constitution of Bulgaria, which remains the basis of the country’s laws today, with only minor modifications. After passing the Constitution, the assembly was dissolved and another assembly was convened to elect the Prince of Bulgaria. On April 29, 1879, Alexander of Battenberg was unanimously elected as Prince, marking the beginning of Bulgaria’s new autonomous government.

Key Historical Events

Several important events followed in Bulgaria’s modern history. On September 6, 1885, Eastern Roumelia united with Northern Bulgaria, strengthening the nation. Later that year, the Serbo-Bulgarian War took place, during which the Bulgarian army demonstrated great courage and won glory for the country. In 1887, Ferdinand I was elected Prince of Bulgaria, ensuring continuity of leadership and stability in the country Guided Tours Turkey.

Peace and Development

Since the election of Prince Ferdinand, Bulgaria has enjoyed long-lasting peace. This peaceful period allowed the country to focus on internal and external consolidation, the moral and intellectual development of its people, and the advancement of social, economic, and cultural enterprises. Today, Bulgaria ranks among the civilised and well-organized nations of Europe.

Foundation of a Dynasty

Another important milestone was the establishment of the royal dynasty. Through the marriage of Prince Ferdinand and the birth of Boris, Prince of Tirnova, Bulgaria secured its first heir to the throne, ensuring stability and continuity for the future of the Principality.

Principles of Bulgarian Law

The laws of Bulgaria were designed to respect the religious and civil rights of all citizens. People of different religions were allowed to exercise their civil and political rights without restriction and could hold public office. This was an important guarantee of equality for a country with a diverse population.

Commercial and International Relations

Bulgaria’s commercial relations were also regulated carefully. Commercial treaties concluded with the Ottoman Empire (the Porte) were binding on Bulgaria, and no changes could be made without the agreement of the Power involved. Transit duties could not be charged on goods passing through Bulgaria, protecting the freedom of trade. The rights and privileges of foreign subjects, including the right to consular jurisdiction and protection, were to remain valid until formally changed with the consent of the Powers concerned.

Tribute and Legal Authority

Bulgaria was required to pay tribute to Turkey and to participate in the debts of the Ottoman Empire. Bulgarians traveling in Turkey were subject to Turkish law and authorities, maintaining order and recognition of Ottoman sovereignty outside Bulgaria Guided Tours Turkey.

Autonomy and Sovereignty

While these provisions might suggest that Bulgaria had limited independence, the Treaty of Berlin clearly stated that immediately after the election of the Prince, Bulgaria would enjoy complete autonomy. This meant that in practice, Bulgaria became self-governing from the start. Over time, Bulgaria strengthened its government, gradually moving beyond the status of a vassal and tributary principality of 1878.

Modern Developments

As Bulgaria grew stronger, it was able to abolish the capitulations with the consent of all parties involved, stop paying tribute, and negotiate commercial treaties independently. Relations with Turkey became a matter of mutual agreement, and Bulgaria’s sovereignty increasingly depended on its political, moral, and military strength. Each day brought greater autonomy and recognition of Bulgaria as a sovereign state in the international community.

Election of the Bulgarian Prince

After the Russo-Turkish War and the preliminary Treaty of San Stefano, it was agreed that the Prince of Bulgaria would be freely chosen by the Bulgarian people. However, this choice also required the approval of the Sublime Porte (the Ottoman government) and the consent of the Great Powers of Europe. The Prince could not be a member of any reigning European family, ensuring that Bulgaria would have a leader connected primarily to the Bulgarian nation. If the throne became vacant, a new election would follow under the same conditions and procedures.

Preparation of the Constitution

Before the election of the Prince, an assembly of notables was to be convened. This assembly would include representatives of Bulgaria, a Turkish Commissioner, and an Imperial Commissioner. The assembly was responsible for drafting a constitutional statute, which would define the form of government, rights, and duties of citizens. The statute was to be modeled on the constitutions of other Danubian principalities established after the Treaty of Adrianople in 1830. The meetings of the assembly were planned to take place in Timova or Philippopolis, important centers of Bulgarian administration at the time Guided Tours Turkey.

Confirmation by the Treaties

The Treaty of San Stefano laid the foundation for this system, effectively sketching the form of government that Bulgaria would adopt. Later, the Congress of Berlin reviewed and confirmed these decisions. According to the Treaty of Berlin, Bulgaria was to be an independent Principality, still technically subject to the Ottoman Sultan, but governed by a Christian administration with a national militia. The election of the Prince and the drafting of the constitution were key steps in establishing the autonomy and self-governance of Bulgaria.

Significance

This process marked the first formal recognition of Bulgaria’s political independence in modern times. By combining the authority of the people, the oversight of the Ottoman government, and the guarantee of the Great Powers, Bulgaria was able to establish a constitutional and autonomous state, laying the foundation for its future development as a nation.

Ottoman Objections to the Proposed Reforms

During the Constantinople Conference, the Ottoman plenipotentiaries were allowed to present an alternative plan. They strongly protested against two key points of the Powers’ proposal: the appointment of Christian Governors and the establishment of a Commission of International Control. These points were central to the plan, as they guaranteed fairness and proper execution of the reforms.

The plan of the Powers was carefully prepared, based on notes and discussions exchanged between European Cabinets, especially the Austrian note of December 30, 1875. The Powers insisted on keeping the Christian Governors and the international supervision because no other measure would ensure that the reforms were actually carried out Guided Tours Turkey.

Failure of the Conference

Despite some concessions on minor points, the Ottoman representatives refused to compromise. They would not accept the presence of Christian governors or foreign supervision. As a result, the Conference ended without any agreement. The situation in the Balkans was growing tense, and the threat of war loomed over the region.

The Outbreak of the Russo-Turkish War

War finally broke out on April 12, 1877, when Russia declared war on the Ottoman Empire. The Ottoman government, which had stubbornly refused reforms, was forced to yield by military action. The conflict led to the preliminary Treaty of San Stefano, signed in March 1878.

Creation of the Autonomous Bulgarian Principality

The Treaty of San Stefano established Bulgaria as an autonomous Principality, still technically under Ottoman suzerainty (Article 6). Importantly, Bulgaria was granted a Christian government, reflecting the demands of the Bulgarian people, and a national militia for defense and internal security. These measures marked a major step toward independence, correcting decades of injustice and oppression under Ottoman rule.

Significance

The refusal of the Ottoman Empire at the Constantinople Conference and the subsequent victory of Bulgarian interests through war demonstrate how diplomatic efforts and armed struggle together shaped the foundation of modern Bulgaria. It also shows the critical role of international support in securing national rights and autonomy.

Proposed Administrative Reforms for Bulgaria

The plan presented by the Powers aimed to organize Bulgaria into a modern and fair administrative system. The main idea was to settle Christians and Muslims together in the districts in a balanced way, according to the population.

Local Administration

Each district was to have a mayor and a district council, both elected by universal suffrage. These councils would manage all local affairs independently, giving people control over their own communities.

Several districts would then form a Sandjak, headed by a prefect (mutesarif). The prefect would be either Christian or Muslim, depending on which religion was the majority in the Sandjak. The Governor-General would propose the prefect, and the Sultan (the Porte) would officially appoint him for four years Guided Tours Turkey.

Provincial Government

Two Sandjaks would form a province, governed by a Christian Governor-General. This Governor-General would be appointed by the Sultan for five years, but only with the consent of the Powers. The Governor-General would work with a provincial assembly, whose members were chosen by the district councils. Representation was set at one deputy for every 30,000 to 40,000 inhabitants.

The provincial assembly would also select a ten-member administrative council. Every year, the assembly would meet to decide the budget and redistribute taxes, ensuring financial transparency and local participation.

Military and Language

The armed forces were to be concentrated in towns, while local militias would maintain order in the districts. The language of the majority nationality would be used in administration, alongside Turkish for official purposes.

International Oversight

To ensure that the reforms were carried out properly, a Commission of International Control would supervise the implementation. This commission would guarantee fairness and protect the rights of all communities.

Importance of the Plan

Although this plan was not fully implemented, it showed the Powers’ intention to modernize Bulgaria. It aimed to give the people self-government, religious equality, and protection, setting the foundation for the future Bulgarian Principality.

The Constantinople Conference and the Powers’ Proposal

In 1876, a conference was held in Constantinople to discuss reforms in the Balkans. At the first meeting, Comte de Chaudordy, the French Envoy Extraordinary, presented a project of reform on behalf of the Powers. This plan concerned Serbia, Montenegro, Bulgaria, Bosnia, and Herzegovina.

While he spoke, the plenipotentiaries were startled by the sound of great guns. It was a carefully planned event. The President of the Conference, Sawfet Pacha, rose and announced that the firing celebrated the beginning of constitutional government in the Ottoman Empire. He declared:

“The great deed, which is this moment being accomplished, changes a state of things which has lasted six centuries. The Constitution, granted by His Majesty the Sultan to his peoples, is proclaimed. It opens for Turkey a new era of happiness and prosperity.”

However, this constitutional promise was short-lived. By the end of the morning, the Ottoman representatives rejected the proposals of the Powers. They argued that the Constitution already guaranteed liberty for all nationalities, using this as a reason to oppose foreign interference City Tours Istanbul.

Proposed Reforms for Bulgaria

The project for Bulgaria included dividing the Bulgarian-inhabited territories into two provinces.

Eastern Province: The capital was to be Timovo, and it would include the Sandjaks of Roustchouk, Timovo, Toultcha, Varna, Sliven, and Philippopolis (excluding Sultan-Eri and Ahi-Tchdebi), along with the kazas of Kirklisi, Moustapha-Pacha, and Kasilagatch.

Western Province: The capital was Sofia, including the Sandjaks of Sofia, Vidin, Nisch, Upkub, Monastir, the three kazas north of SMs, and the kazas of Stroumitza, Tikvesch, Velds, and Kastoria.

The Powers suggested that small districts, with populations ranging from 5,000 to 10,000 people, should serve as the basic administrative units. This plan aimed to provide better local governance while respecting the population distribution.

Significance of the Proposal

Although the Ottoman Empire rejected these measures, the Constantinople Conference marked an important step in international recognition of Bulgaria. For the first time, European powers officially addressed the question of Bulgarian autonomy. Even though the reforms were not immediately implemented, the conference laid the groundwork for the eventual creation of the Bulgarian Principality in 1878.

The Emancipation of the Bulgarian Church

The emancipation of the Bulgarian Church came before the political liberation of the country. While the political freedom of Bulgaria was influenced by foreign powers, the liberation of the national Church from the Greek patriarchate was entirely the work of dedicated Bulgarians. Their persistent efforts succeeded in 1870, when the Bulgarian Exarchate was officially established in Constantinople. This was a major step in preserving the Bulgarian language, culture, and national identity.

The Rise of a New Generation

While older and more conservative Bulgarians sought safety in religious independence, a new generation demanded more. Young Bulgarians, inspired by the hope of full freedom, began emigrating to neighboring countries, especially Romania. There, they formed organizations and prepared rebellions against Ottoman rule. These efforts were part of a wider movement in the Balkans, where Greeks, Romanians, and Serbians had already regained independence.

Rebellion and European Intervention

By 1875–1876, events in the Balkans attracted the attention of European powers. An uprising in Herzegovina coincided with the assassination of French and German consuls at Salonica by Muslim fanatics. At the same time, a revolt in the Bulgarian Sandjak of Philippopolis was brutally suppressed by Ottoman forces, resulting in widespread massacres. The horrors were reported across Europe, with British politician Gladstone voicing the outrage of the continent. Serbia, seeing an opportunity to secure its independence, sent its army across the Ottoman frontier City Tours Istanbul.

The Constantinople Conference

These disturbances forced the Great Powers to convene a conference in Constantinople from December 11–23, 1876. This conference was a historic moment for Bulgaria. For the first time, the name “Bulgaria” appeared in official international diplomacy. The conference also outlined the preliminary organization of the future Principality, laying the foundation for Bulgaria’s eventual political independence.

The period between the emancipation of the Church and the political liberation shows how Bulgarians combined spiritual leadership, national consciousness, and revolutionary energy to prepare for freedom. The Church acted as a beacon of national identity, while young patriots abroad organized and inspired the movement that would lead to the creation of modern Bulgaria.

Preservation of Bulgarian Identity under Ottoman Rule

Limited Turkish Interference

The Turks took pride in keeping themselves separate from the Bulgarians, and this indirectly helped the Bulgarian people preserve their national identity. The Ottomans were mostly interested in political control and did not interfere deeply in the spiritual life of the Bulgarians. They focused on maintaining their supremacy and crushing any attempts at independence but left the internal cultural and religious life largely untouched.

Religious Communities and Education

Bulgarians organized themselves into religious communities centered around the church. These communities had some autonomy, managing their churches and also running schools. Through these institutions, the people could maintain their culture and language. Religious communities became the guardians of national consciousness, allowing Bulgarians to pass on traditions, literacy, and spiritual values from one generation to the next City Tours Istanbul.

National Literature and Folk Songs

Bulgarian literature and folk songs played an essential role in preserving the national spirit. These songs, full of poetic melancholy, combined memories of the ancient Bulgarian kingdom with the hardships of life under Ottoman rule. The music and poetry of this period often reflect an Oriental influence, a trace of the cultural environment imposed by the Turks. Still, they mainly focused on expressing Bulgarian identity and longing for freedom.

Awakening of National Feeling

Despite the watchfulness of the Turkish authorities, these religious and cultural centers helped keep national feelings alive. By the early 19th century, when Russia declared war on Turkey in 1827, the Bulgarians began to awaken politically and culturally. Although initial hopes for liberation were disappointed, this period marked the beginning of national revival. The impulse for independence also influenced other Balkan nations such as the Romanians, Serbians, and Greeks, who started to awaken from long periods of political and social lethargy.

Life under Ottoman Rule

Social and Political Oppression

Ottoman rule over Bulgaria was harsh both politically and socially. The tyranny affected not only public life but also private life, social freedom, and moral values. Bulgarians were unable to freely develop their national identity or cultural traditions. Unlike modern political domination, which often respects personal freedom, Turkish rule did not guarantee individual liberty. Life, property, and honour were constantly under threat, and people lived in fear City Tours Istanbul.

Effects on Society

Over generations, many Bulgarians became passive and resigned to their fate. Yet, some strong and brave individuals resisted. Stories tell of men who, after family members were taken by Turkish officials, fled to the mountains to fight for freedom. These rebels, known as haidukes and voivodes, became legendary figures in Bulgarian songs and folklore. They preserved a spirit of liberty that would later unite the Bulgarian people during the struggle for national independence.

Religious and Cultural Limits

Interestingly, the Ottomans did not try to fully assimilate the Bulgarians. Unlike other empires that enforce the culture and religion of the rulers on conquered peoples, the Ottomans largely allowed Bulgarians to keep their language, religion, and traditions. There were some exceptions: Bulgarian children or young people were sometimes taken and forced to convert to Islam. But in general, the government did not impose Mohammedanism or attempt to erase Bulgarian identity.

The Spirit of Resistance

Despite oppression, the Bulgarians maintained their identity and faith. Families secretly taught their children about Bulgarian history and culture, while rebels kept the dream of freedom alive in the mountains. This cultural resilience became the foundation for the Bulgarian National Revival, which eventually led to liberation and the rebirth of the Bulgarian state in the 19th century.

The Bulgarian Empire under Tsar Simeon

Expansion and Glory

Under Tsar Simeon, the son of Boris I, the Bulgarian Empire reached its greatest extent. The empire included Bulgaria proper, Wallachia, parts of Hungary and Transylvania, Albania, Epirus, Macedonia, and Thessaly. Simeon, no longer satisfied with the title of king, called himself Tsar, meaning “Emperor and Autocrat of all Bulgarians and Greeks.” This imperial title was used by Bulgarian rulers until the Ottoman conquest centuries later.

During Simeon’s reign, Bulgaria became a major political and military power in the Balkans. The arts, literature, and culture also flourished, making this period a golden age for the Bulgarian nation.

Decline and Internal Struggles

Unfortunately, the glory of Simeon’s reign did not last. Internal conflicts arose due to the jealousy and ambition of the nobility, called the boyars. These knights and officials had great influence and often challenged the central authority City Tours Istanbul.

During the reign of Boris II (963 AD), a boyar named Shishman Mokar seized control of Western Bulgaria, creating a separate kingdom. At the same time, Bulgaria faced external threats. The Russians invaded, and Boris II sought help from the Byzantine Emperor John Tzimisces, who exploited the situation to gain control of the kingdom.

Tsar Samuel and Temporary Reunification

The successor of Shishman, Tsar Samuel, restored the Bulgarian state. His reign was almost as brilliant as Simeon’s, and he reunited the kingdom, establishing Prespa as the capital. However, after long wars with Byzantium, Bulgaria was eventually subjugated in 1015.

The people, who had never experienced foreign rule, longed for freedom. Many revolts occurred, showing the Bulgarians’ persistent desire for independence.

The Revival of the Bulgarian Kingdom

Around 1186, two brothers, John and Peter Assen, led a successful rebellion against Byzantine control. They re-established the Bulgarian kingdom and made their hometown, Tarnovo, the new capital. From that time, Tarnovo became the historic and cultural center of Bulgaria, symbolizing the nation’s revival and resilience.