Sects and Heresies Among the Turks

It is commonly believed that there are seventy-two sects among the Turks, though the actual number is probably higher. The precise count is unknown because many minor groups and local variations are often overlooked. Turkish scholars connect this number to an old belief about the seventy-two nations into which the world was divided after the confusion of languages at Babel. They see this as a symbol of future religious divisions.

According to this interpretation, seventy sects arose among the Jews, seventy-one among the Christians, and the Muslims received one final and ultimate religion. In their view, Islam represents the complete fulfillment of true doctrine, and it marks the end of the many errors and deviations that human judgment had created in the earlier faiths. They believe that in this last religion, the mystery of iniquity is confined, and the paths of error are finally corrected.

Influence of Other Religions

Despite Islam being considered the ultimate religion, sects and heresies still exist among the Turks. Many of these divisions are influenced by Christian doctrines or by local practices that deviate from orthodox Islam. These heretical sects vary in size and influence, but they are seen as potentially dangerous because they may encourage misinterpretation of the law and weaken unity within the empire Private Ephesus Tours.

In earlier times, there were even groups of fanatic Muslims who began by meeting secretly in religious congregations. Over time, some of these groups became more organized and armed, posing a direct challenge to the authority of the government. Their activities showed how religious disagreement could have both spiritual and political consequences, especially when zeal and passion escalated into rebellion.

Religious Zeal and Social Consequences

The existence of multiple sects highlights the diversity of thought even within a single faith. While Islam is considered complete and final, human interpretation and deviation continue to produce new ideas and groups. This diversity can foster both healthy debate and dangerous conflict, depending on how strongly the groups adhere to or deviate from official doctrine.

Understanding these sects is important for seeing how Ottoman society balanced religious orthodoxy with social order. Sects, heresies, and differing interpretations of law and faith influenced politics, governance, and daily life. They remind us that religion in the Ottoman Empire was not static but dynamic, shaped continuously by belief, interpretation, and human action.

Fleeing During Plagues

The Wise and the General Population

While many Turks faced contagious diseases with reckless courage, some people chose a different path. Especially the Kadees and men of the law, who were often more educated and experienced than the general population, preferred to protect their lives by retreating to private villages with cleaner air. These individuals understood, through reason and observation, that fresh and healthy air could preserve life during outbreaks of plague.

By taking this precaution, they often survived and were able to return to their homes healthy and strong, even when their neighbors, less cautious or less knowledgeable, had perished. This practice became common among a group of Turks known as the Jebare. Another group, called the Kadere, followed slightly different customs, but the principle remained the same: careful management of risk could protect life without abandoning religious duty.

Religious Diversity and Confusion

One of the most striking observations about human society is the incredible variety of religions. Despite all humans sharing similar rational capacities and the same natural inclination to worship a deity, countless different faiths have developed over time. Each religion often has its own interpretations of God, moral rules, and practices, leading to widespread diversity of belief Private Ephesus Tours.

It is particularly surprising that societies capable of advanced governance, law, and rational thought often adopt religious beliefs that seem fanciful or superstitious. In some nations, people place trust in stories told by elderly women, the predictions of fortune-tellers, or the visions of solitary hermits. These practices, though widely accepted, may appear strange or irrational to outsiders.

Similar Foundations, Different Practices

Even among people who share the same basic principles of faith, there can be significant differences in interpretation and practice. While the foundation of belief may be the same, the forms of worship, rituals, and rules often vary. These differences create disagreement and division even among those who otherwise follow the same religion.

For the Turks, this diversity is evident in the distinctions between groups like the Jebare and the Kadere, as well as in broader debates about fate, predestination, and religious duty. While some follow extreme courage in the face of danger, others take precautions guided by reason. This combination of faith and practical judgment reflects the complexity of Ottoman religious life, where doctrine, tradition, and personal understanding often intersect in unexpected ways.

Belief in Predestination and Destiny

The Turks hold a strong belief that every person’s destiny is written on their forehead at birth. They call this Nassip or Tabir, meaning the “Book of Fate” in Heaven. According to this belief, no effort, advice, or wisdom can change what is already written. People are convinced that their life and death are predetermined, and nothing they do can alter it.

This belief in fixed destiny is deeply rooted in the minds of ordinary people and even soldiers. It often leads them to act with extreme courage, sometimes to the point of recklessness. Soldiers may throw themselves into battle without regard for their own safety, seeing their lives as insignificant and willing to risk them to achieve victory. In fact, this belief has often worked to the advantage of the Turks, guiding them in war and other critical decisions Private Tour Ephesus.

Fearlessness in the Face of Danger

This doctrine of predestination also affects how people respond to disease and death. According to the teachings of Muhammad, believers should not abandon their homes even when a plague or deadly infection strikes. The idea is that God has already determined the time and manner of each person’s death. Because of this belief, many Turks will care for the sick and even enter infected areas without fear, treating those afflicted by plague as normally as people treat those suffering from less dangerous illnesses such as gout or fever.

Even when they observe that Christians often escape the plague by fleeing to healthier areas, while others remain and die, their belief in predestination is so strong that they continue to follow the same practice. They consider avoidance of danger unnecessary because God’s will cannot be evaded.

Social and Military Implications

This faith in fate has wide-ranging effects. On the battlefield, it makes soldiers fearless and extremely determined. In daily life, it encourages courage and devotion in the face of epidemics and other hazards. While outsiders may see these actions as reckless or foolish, the Turks see them as obedience to God’s will.

Overall, the doctrine of destiny, or Nassip, shapes both the spiritual outlook and practical behavior of the Ottoman people. It explains their bravery, their acceptance of risk, and their reliance on divine will in both war and daily life, reinforcing a culture of courage and devotion deeply rooted in faith.

Endowments and Wealth of Turkish Mosques

In summary, the wealth and support of Turkish mosques come from a combination of donations, lands, rents, and charitable gifts. Royal mosques receive large endowments from sultans and royal families, while smaller mosques depend on private gifts, bequests, and income from lands or properties. These revenues are carefully managed to support religious scholars, students, and charitable activities such as feeding the poor, caring for travelers, and maintaining hospitals.

The system is designed so that mosques are not only centers of worship but also centers of learning, social support, and community life. By observing the management of royal mosques, it is possible to understand how other mosques and religious institutions in the empire operate.

The Doctrine of Predestination According to Turkish Scholars

Turkish religious scholars, or doctors of the law, hold a strict view of predestination. Their doctrine resembles, in some ways, the beliefs of certain Calvinist thinkers in Europe. They interpret passages of scripture to support the idea that God determines the fate of every individual. For example, they cite phrases such as “the Lord said to the Potter, ‘What are you making?’ I will harden the heart of Pharaoh” and “Jacob I have loved, but Esau I have hated.” These texts are used to argue that God’s will is decisive in all matters of life Private Tour Ephesus.

The Turks do not give the same final authority to the Old Testament. Instead, they believe that the Qur’an, being more recent, expresses the will of God more clearly and perfectly. For this reason, the teachings of the Qur’an replace the laws of the older scriptures in guiding their faith and practice.

Some scholars go further, claiming that God is the ultimate author of both good and evil. They argue that all events, whether fortunate or harmful, occur according to divine will. This strict view of predestination helps explain why they interpret historical events, including wars and victories, as signs of God’s favor. For example, they saw the outcomes of Sultan Bayezid’s conflicts with his brother Selim as evidence of divine will and guidance.

Conquests and Divine Approval

Turkish scholars also use the empire’s successes as a measure of divine approval. Victories in war, territorial expansion, and prosperity are seen as evidence that God supports their religion and rulers. By observing the outcomes of political and military events, they interpret God’s favor and guidance for both the sultan and the faith as a whole.

In this way, the doctrine of predestination reinforces both religious devotion and loyalty to the state. It connects divine will directly with worldly events, encouraging the belief that the empire’s prosperity reflects the correctness of their religion and the justice of their rulers. This view shaped both the spiritual and political understanding of the Ottoman elite, linking faith and governance in a single system of divine and temporal authority.

Who the Emirs Are

The Emirs, also called the descendants of the Prophet, are counted among the religious people in their society. They are believed to come from the family line of the Prophet Muhammad. Because of this claimed noble origin, they are treated with special honor and respect. One of the main signs that shows their status is the green turban they wear. This deep green color is connected with the Prophet and is seen as a symbol of his holy lineage.

Out of respect for what is considered sacred blood, many privileges are given to the Emirs by the civil authorities. It is forbidden for ordinary people to insult, strike, or publicly dishonor them. Such actions are considered serious offenses. This protection is meant to preserve the dignity of their supposed noble ancestry and religious importance.

Privileges and Authority Among the Emirs

Although the Emirs enjoy many privileges, they are not completely without control. They have a chief leader called the Nakib Efendi, who acts as their head and supervisor. Under him are officers who help manage the affairs of this group. The chief has strong authority over the Emirs and can discipline them when necessary Private Tour Guide Ephesus.

However, even when punishment is required, it is usually handled in a quiet and respectful manner. Public punishment is often avoided so that the honor of their lineage is not openly damaged. This shows how much importance is placed on preserving their reputation and social standing.

Questions About Lineage and Public Perception

In reality, not all Emirs can clearly prove their descent from the Prophet. Some only claim this ancestry without strong evidence. At times, records of genealogy may be prepared or supported by officials to strengthen such claims. This practice can create doubt among the general population.

Because people are aware that some claims of noble descent may be uncertain, they sometimes show less respect to the group as a whole. If an Emir behaves in a disorderly or improper way, people may first remove the green turban out of respect for the symbol, and then deal with the person as an ordinary individual. This action shows that the honor is attached more to the symbol and lineage than to personal behavior.

Roles and Occupations of the Emirs

Another officer among them is called the Memdar, who carries the green banner of the Prophet during public ceremonies when the Sultan appears. This role is symbolic and shows the connection between political authority and religious tradition.

The Emirs are allowed to hold different offices within the empire, but many of them do not engage in common trades. Some are involved in certain forms of commerce, including trade related to captives, which in earlier times was considered acceptable within the laws and customs of the empire.

Overall, the Emirs hold a unique position that combines religious honor, social privilege, and ceremonial duty. Their importance comes mainly from their claimed descent and the respect given to their symbolic connection with the Prophet, rather than from a specific religious office or daily religious function.

Independence of the Emaums

In religious matters, the Mufti does not have direct control over the Emaums in their daily work. He does not manage the order or government of each parish. There is no strong hierarchy or church structure in which one Emaum rules over another. Each Emaum is independent in his own parish and leads his local congregation without interference from other religious leaders.

However, Emaums are still subject to the civil authorities in matters of law. In civil and criminal cases, they must answer to the chief magistrates of the state, just like other citizens. Their independence applies mainly to their religious duties, not to political or legal matters.

Because of the simple way Emaums are appointed, and because there is little difference between religious leaders and ordinary people, their system may appear similar to independent church movements in other countries. The clergy are not separated from the people by special holy orders or permanent ranks. Instead, they serve in their role for as long as they hold their office. Once removed, they return to ordinary life Ephesus Daily Tour .

Respect for Churchmen and Lawyers

Religious scholars and lawyers are highly respected in society. This respect is shown in the formal titles used when writing or speaking to them. Official letters often address them with great praise, using words that honor their wisdom, knowledge, and skill. They may be called the glory of judges and wise men, and their learning and eloquence are admired.

Such titles show how important religious and legal learning is in their culture. Those who understand the law and religion are considered valuable to the order and stability of the empire. Their wisdom is seen as something that should grow and increase for the good of all.

The Mufti’s Investiture Ceremony

When a new Mufti is chosen, there is only a simple ceremony for his appointment. He presents himself before the Sultan. The Sultan then honors him by placing on him a valuable robe or veil made of rich sable fur. This garment is very expensive and shows the high dignity of the office.

In addition to the robe, the Sultan gives the Mufti a gift of gold. The gold is placed in a handkerchief and personally given to him. The Sultan puts it into the fold of the Mufti’s garment as a sign of favor and trust. This act confirms his position and shows royal support.

The Mufti’s Salary and Income

The Mufti also receives a daily salary, which is paid in aspers. This regular payment provides him with a comfortable income. However, he does not have many other fixed sources of revenue.

One important privilege he holds is the power to appoint certain religious officials to positions in royal mosques. These positions, sometimes connected with stipends or benefits, can be given to others. It is said that the Mufti may sell or grant these offices in ways that benefit himself, and this practice is not always considered improper in that system.

In this way, the Mufti’s income comes partly from his salary and partly from his influence over religious appointments. His wealth and honor both depend greatly on the favor of the Sultan and the authority of his office.

Qualifications of the Emaums

The Emaums, or local parish priests, must meet certain basic requirements before they can serve in their office. First, they must be able to read clearly from the holy book, the Alcoran. They must also be known as men of good reputation and honest moral lives among their neighbors. Their character and behavior are very important, because they are expected to guide the religious life of the community.

Before becoming an Emaum, a person usually learns the proper way to perform religious duties, including the call to prayer. At the appointed times of prayer, he must be able to call the people together from the top of the mosque tower. During this call, he repeats the traditional words that praise God and declare faith, reminding the people that God is great and that Muhammad is His Prophet. This call invites the community to gather for worship and prepares them spiritually for prayer.

Appointment and Approval Process

When an Emaum dies or leaves his position, the people of the parish may recommend a new candidate. They present his name to the Prime Vizier and declare that the person is suitable, knowledgeable, and worthy of the office. Sometimes they may even suggest that he is more learned than the previous Emaum Ephesus Daily Tour.

To make sure the recommendation is true, the candidate is usually asked to read a portion of the Alcoran in the presence of the Vizier or another authority. This serves as a simple test of his learning and ability. If he reads well and shows proper knowledge, he is approved for the position. After this, he receives an official document, often called a mandate, which confirms his appointment. This process is direct and does not require many complex ceremonies.

Nature of the Office

The appointment of an Emaum involves very little formal ceremony. In their belief, no special spiritual character or permanent priestly status is given to him. He is not considered a different kind of person set apart by sacred rites, as in some other religious traditions. Instead, he is simply a member of the community who performs a religious duty.

If he is later removed from his position, he returns to being an ordinary member of society. His role is defined mainly by the office he holds, not by a lifelong religious order. Even his clothing is not very different from that of other people. The main distinction is that he often wears a larger turban, similar to that worn by scholars and lawyers, and keeps a serious and respectful appearance.

Duties in the Mosque and Community

The primary duty of the Emaum is to call the people to prayer and lead them in worship at the mosque at the proper hours. He also reads and repeats selected verses from the Alcoran, especially during the important Friday prayers. His voice and guidance help maintain order and devotion within the congregation.

Most Emaums do not regularly give sermons unless they are especially skilled or confident in teaching. Preaching is often left to professional religious speakers who are trained for that purpose. These preachers may spend much of their time in religious schools or convent-like institutions, where they study and prepare for teaching. In this way, the Emaum mainly focuses on leading prayer and maintaining daily religious practice, while more advanced instruction is given by specialized scholars.

The Office of the Judge of the Militia

The office that comes next after the Mufti is called the Kadelefchere, or the Judge of the Militia. This official is similar to a Judge Advocate and has the authority to decide many kinds of legal cases. His power is not limited only to military matters, but can also extend to other law disputes when needed.

In this system, the soldiers of the empire enjoy a special privilege. They have influence and authority over many other groups in society, yet they are mainly judged and governed by their own officers and legal authorities. This means that the military class is, in many ways, separate from the rest of the population in matters of law and discipline.

Before a man can become Mufti, he must usually pass through the office of Kadelefchere. He must perform well and earn approval in this important position before he can rise to the highest religious office. This shows that experience in law and judgment is considered necessary for greater responsibility.

The Rank of the Mollas

Below the Kadelefchere are the Mollas, who are also respected legal and religious officials. There are two main kinds of Mollas, distinguished by their rank and salary. One group receives three hundred aspers, and the other receives five hundred aspers. These titles help show their level of authority and responsibility Ephesus Daily Tour.

The Mollas of the lower rank usually act as chief judges in smaller provinces. Under their authority are local judges, known as Kadees, who serve in poorer or less important towns. The higher-ranking Mollas, however, have greater power. Their authority can extend over the whole region governed by a Beglerbeg, and they supervise judges in wealthy and famous cities.

Because of their experience and learning, some Mollas eventually rise to the office of Mufti. However, this promotion does not happen quickly. They must advance step by step, serving in several important judicial posts before reaching the highest level. For example, a judge might first serve in a major city such as Bursa, then in Adrianople, and finally in the capital, Constantinople. After holding such important positions, he may then be considered for the office of Kadelefchere and later for the office of Mufti.

The Role of the Kadees and Religious Law

The Kadees, who are the ordinary and lower-level judges, are also counted among the religious scholars. Even though they deal with civil disputes, their work is closely connected with religion. In the Ottoman understanding, civil law is believed to come from the teachings of their Prophet and the traditions of their faith.

Because of this belief, legal judgments are not seen as separate from religion. Instead, they are treated as part of the same moral and spiritual system that guides worship and daily life. The scholars who interpret the law, whether they are Muftis, Mollas, or Kadees, are all respected as religious figures. Their duty is not only to judge legal matters but also to protect justice according to religious principles.

For this reason, the legal system and the religious system are closely united. The judges are expected to show fairness, wisdom, and knowledge of both law and faith. In this way, the administration of justice is considered a sacred responsibility, and those who serve in these offices hold an important place in both government and religion.

The Mufti’s Power to Interpret the Law

The Mufti has a wide and important role in interpreting religious law. It is generally accepted that their law is not fixed forever, but can be explained and applied differently according to the time, place, and condition of the empire. Although religious teachers often speak about the perfection of their holy book, wiser scholars believe that the Mufti has the authority to explain the law in ways that make it more suitable for changing situations.

They believe that the law was never meant to block the spread of faith or create unnecessary difficulty. Instead, it was meant to support and strengthen the faith. For this reason, the law may sometimes be understood in a broader and more flexible way when strict words do not fit the real needs of life. In matters of religion and conscience, the Mufti is often asked to give guidance on difficult and unusual questions.

Adapting Religious Duties to Different Conditions

One famous example concerns a question about prayer in very northern regions of the world. It was asked how a Muslim who lived in a place where winter daylight lasted only one hour could perform the five daily prayers required within twenty-four hours. Normally, these prayers are said at morning, noon, afternoon, sunset, and night. However, when there is almost no daylight, these divisions of time become impossible to follow in the usual way Ephesus Daily Tour.

To answer this, the Mufti explained that God does not command people to do what is impossible or overly difficult. Therefore, religious duties should be adjusted according to time and place. He advised that the person could say short prayers once before daylight, twice during the short hour of light, and twice after darkness. In this way, the obligation would still be fulfilled, even under unusual conditions.

Direction of Prayer at Sea

Another question was about the direction of prayer, which must face the holy city of Mecca. At sea, sailors often had no clear way to know the correct direction, especially since many lacked good knowledge of geography. This made it difficult to follow the proper rule during prayer.

The Mufti gave a practical solution. He suggested that a person at sea could make a gentle circular movement while praying. By doing this, they would face the holy city at some point during the prayer. In a situation full of uncertainty, this was considered an acceptable way to perform the duty.

Difficult Moral Questions and Mercy

Many complex cases of conscience were brought to the Mufti for judgment. One notable example happened during wars between a Christian emperor and an Ottoman sultan. The question was whether a small number of Christian prisoners could be exchanged for a larger number of Muslim captives. The Mufti found this problem very difficult. On one side, it seemed wrong to value a Muslim less than a Christian. On the other side, refusing the exchange could harm many Muslims who needed rescue.

After consulting respected scholars, he found that different authorities had opposing views. In the end, he chose the opinion that showed the most mercy and compassion, believing this to be the wiser decision.

Punishment and the Limits of Office

While holding his title, the Mufti was rarely executed. If he lost favor or committed serious errors, he was usually removed from office first. After losing his position, he could then be punished like any other official. Only in cases of very serious crimes, such as treason, would he face harsh punishment. This shows that, although the office was respected and powerful, it did not fully protect a person from justice or political consequences.

The Sultan and the Mufti in Matters of State

In affairs of the state, the Sultan often asks for the opinion of the Mufti, especially when dealing with very serious issues. These issues may include the punishment of a powerful person, the decision to start a war, to make peace, or to change important laws and policies in the empire. By asking the Mufti for advice, the Sultan appears more just and religious in the eyes of the people. This practice also helps the public accept his decisions more willingly, because they believe the judgment is guided by religion and law, not only by personal power.

It is said that very few high officials, such as a Vizier or a Pasha, are removed from their positions or punished without the Sultan first supporting his actions with the Mufti’s ruling. Human nature often trusts decisions that seem fair and lawful more than those made only by force. Even though the Sultan holds great authority and is seen as the main source of justice, he rarely ignores the religious authority that their faith places in the Mufti as the final judge in difficult questions.

When the Mufti Cannot Give a Clear Answer

Sometimes the Sultan sends difficult questions to the Mufti that he cannot answer with a clear and satisfied conscience. When this happens, important matters of the state may face delays and obstacles. In such situations, the Mufti may be quietly removed from his position, and another scholar is appointed to take his place. This new Mufti is expected to give a judgment that better supports the interests and goals of the Sultan Ephesus Daily Tour.

If the second Mufti also refuses or cannot give a favorable answer, he may also be replaced. This process can continue until someone is found who can provide a decision that agrees with what the ruler desires. Although the office of Mufti is considered sacred, political needs sometimes influence how the role is used.

Changes in Respect for the Office Over Time

In earlier times, Ottoman rulers treated the office of the Mufti with great respect. No war or major project was started without first asking for his religious approval, much like ancient rulers who consulted oracles before taking action. His decision was seen as necessary for gaining success and divine blessing.

However, in later times, this tradition became less strict. Consultation with the Mufti was sometimes done only as a formality. In many cases, the Prime Vizier, confident in his own wisdom and authority, would act first and seek religious approval afterward. This change shows how political power gradually became more independent, even though the appearance of religious legitimacy was still maintained.

Background A Time of Religious Change

In the early period of Islam, which the writer calls “Mahometanism,” the religion was still new and not yet strong. At that time, much of the world already followed Christianity. Christianity was active and full of devotion, good works, and strong belief. Even though it had been weakened by disagreements and divisions, such as the teachings of Arius and Nestorius, it was still supported by emperors and kings. Because of this support, Christians were not only patient and hopeful, but also protected by political power and strong institutions.

This situation made it difficult for the new Islamic faith to spread easily. It had to compete with a well-established religion that already had loyal followers, respected leaders, and organized communities. As a result, Islam had to act carefully and wisely in order to grow Guided Istanbul Tour.

The Strategy of Tolerance in the Early Period

Since Islam was at a disadvantage in its early years, its leaders used a peaceful and moderate approach. Instead of openly fighting other religions everywhere, they often showed a friendly and tolerant attitude. They offered peace and agreement, especially toward Christians and other religious groups. In areas where Muslim rule became strong, they sometimes allowed people of different religions to continue practicing their faith.

This policy of tolerance was also a form of strategy. It helped reduce conflict and made it easier for people to accept the new rule. Rather than using only force, they tried to win support through diplomacy, promises of peace, and religious flexibility. This approach was especially useful in regions where Christians were numerous and deeply committed to their beliefs.

Similarities Presented with Christian Beliefs

Another important method used was to show some similarities between Islamic teachings and Christian ideas. For example, Islam recognized Jesus (Christ) as a prophet and a holy figure. It also accepted that he was born of a virgin and performed miracles such as healing the sick and raising the dead. Because of these shared ideas, Muslims sometimes spoke of Jesus with respect and honor.

Some Muslims also believed that it would be wrong to think that God would allow such a favored prophet to suffer a humiliating death. For this reason, they denied the crucifixion as it is understood in Christianity. This belief was presented as a way to protect the dignity of Christ rather than to insult him.

Political and Religious Influence

The article suggests that this early tolerance was partly political. When Islam was still growing and facing strong Christian kingdoms, peaceful relations and religious tolerance helped maintain stability. Open violence or harsh pressure would not have been effective against people who valued martyrdom and were protected by their rulers.

Therefore, offering freedom of religion and showing respect toward Christian teachings helped Islam gain acceptance in many places. This policy allowed the religion to expand while avoiding constant conflict. Over time, however, the way this agreement and tolerance were practiced could change depending on political power and historical circumstances.

The Five Main Duties of the Law

Although there were many discussions among scholars about how to explain religious law, a person was still considered a true believer if he followed the five main duties or fundamental principles. These duties were simple but very important in everyday life. They formed the basic religious practice for every follower.

The first duty was cleanliness. Believers were expected to keep their bodies and clothes clean. Cleanliness was not only a physical matter but also a sign of discipline and respect for religious life. Washing before prayer and wearing clean garments were seen as acts of devotion.

The second duty was prayer. Followers were required to pray five times each day at fixed times. These prayers helped people remember God regularly and stay connected with their faith throughout the day. Prayer was both a personal and communal activity, often performed in homes or places of worship.

The third duty was fasting during the month of Ramadan. During this month, believers were expected to fast from dawn until sunset. Fasting was meant to teach self-control, patience, and sympathy for the poor. It was also a time for reflection, charity, and spiritual growth Guided Istanbul Tour.

The fourth duty was giving alms, known as zakat. This was a form of charity given according to certain rules explained by religious scholars. Giving to the poor and those in need was considered a moral responsibility and a way to create a more just society.

The fifth duty was the pilgrimage to Mecca, if a person had the means and health to travel. This journey was seen as a special act of devotion and unity among believers from different regions.

The Core Article of Faith

Despite the many practices and duties, the main belief required was simple: that there is one God and that Muhammad is His Prophet. This statement of faith formed the foundation of the religion. Other practices, such as circumcision, observing Friday as a day of devotion, and avoiding certain foods like pork and blood, were seen as additional acts of obedience rather than the main principles.

Early Attitude Toward Other Religions

A Period of Tolerance in the Beginning

In its early period, the new religious movement presented itself in a moderate and careful way. At that time, many regions were already influenced by Christianity and other established religions. These communities had strong traditions, organized teachings, and devoted followers.

Because the new faith was still growing, it often showed a degree of tolerance toward other religions. Agreements and promises were sometimes made to allow different religious groups to live and practice their beliefs. This approach helped the religion spread peacefully in certain areas and gain acceptance among diverse populations.

Changes Over Time

However, as the political and military strength of Muslim states increased, the situation changed in many regions. The earlier agreements with other religious communities were not always followed in the same way. Political interests, expansion of territories, and social changes often influenced how religious tolerance was practiced.

In some places, different religious groups were allowed to continue their worship but under certain rules and restrictions. In other areas, conflicts and tensions arose due to differences in belief and power. Thus, the relationship between religions varied depending on historical circumstances, leadership, and local conditions.

In simple terms, the religious system described here focused on a few clear duties: cleanliness, prayer, fasting, charity, and pilgrimage. Along with the basic belief in one God and His Prophet, these practices shaped the daily life of believers. While early interactions with other religions sometimes showed tolerance, the way these agreements were followed changed over time as political and social conditions developed.

Origin of the Law and Religion

It is commonly known that the religious law followed by the Turks was believed to be compiled by the Prophet Muhammad. Some old writers claimed that he was helped by other religious figures, but such statements come from historical opinions and should be read carefully. The religion that developed from his teachings came to be known as Islam, and its followers organized their beliefs, laws, and daily life around sacred texts and traditions.

Instead of repeating stories about personal lives, it is more useful to examine the main rules, teachings, and practices of this religion. The religious system of the Turks was based on important books and scholarly interpretations, which guided both spiritual life and civil government. These texts acted like legal and moral codes for the believers and were respected as the foundation of their religious and social order.

The Three Main Sources of Religious Law

The First Book The Alcoran (Qur’an)

The first and most important book is the Alcoran, also known as the Qur’an. This is considered the central holy book of the religion. It contains religious teachings, moral instructions, and guidance for personal behavior and community life. Followers believe that it provides divine direction on how to live, worship, and organize society Guided Istanbul Tour.

The Qur’an also includes some general rules related to justice, ethics, and social order. Because of this, it influenced not only religious practices but also civil laws and governance in many Muslim societies.

The Second Source Traditions and Testimonies

The second source of religious law is the collection of traditions, often called the Sunnah. These traditions include the recorded sayings, actions, and examples of the Prophet. Religious scholars studied these traditions carefully and used them to explain and interpret the teachings of the Qur’an.

The testimony and agreement of wise scholars were highly respected. Their interpretations helped people understand how to apply religious rules in daily life. Over time, these traditions became an essential part of religious law and practice.

The Third Source Reasoning and Interpretation

The third source consists of reasoning and deductions made by religious scholars. When new situations appeared that were not directly explained in the sacred texts, scholars used logic and comparison to form conclusions. This process allowed the law to adapt to changing social and political conditions while still remaining connected to religious principles.

Role of Early Scholars and Leaders

After the time of the Prophet, several important leaders and scholars contributed to the development of religious law. Among them were early caliphs and respected teachers who explained and expanded the legal and religious system. Their writings and decisions were treated with great authority by the believers.

Later, religious authority gradually shifted to leading scholars and legal experts, such as the Mufti in the Ottoman system. These figures were responsible for giving official legal opinions and guiding society in matters of religion and law.

Diversity of Opinions Among Scholars

Although the religious law had strong foundations, there was not always complete agreement among scholars. Different teachers sometimes had different interpretations of the same texts. This diversity shows that the legal and religious system was not entirely fixed but developed through discussion and scholarship.

In simple terms, the religion of the Turks was built on sacred texts, traditions, and scholarly interpretation. Together, these elements formed a structured system that influenced both faith and everyday life, shaping the moral, legal, and social order of their society.

Opinions About the Honesty and Justice of the Turks

In this passage, the author expresses surprise at reading books that praise the honesty and justice of the Turks and describe them as people with strong moral virtues. Some writers, according to the author, admired their discipline, order, and moral behavior. From this praise, a few even suggested that moral life and good behavior were not limited to Christians, and that other societies could also show strong ethical values.

However, the original writer disagrees with this view. He argues that those who praise the Turks too highly may not have carefully studied their history, religion, or daily life. In his opinion, such writers form their judgments without full knowledge. He believes that when people do not understand a culture well, they may create overly positive or overly negative descriptions based on limited information.

In simple terms, this part of the text shows how historical authors often judged other nations through their own religious and cultural beliefs. It also reminds us that historical writings can reflect personal opinions rather than objective facts Guided Istanbul Tour.

The Religion of the Turks in General

Unity of Civil Law and Religion

The text then moves to a general description of the religion of the Turks. It explains that, in their system, civil laws and religious laws were closely connected and often treated as one single body of rules. This means that political authority and religious authority were seen as coming from the same source.

According to the passage, the people believed that their civil laws were given by God through their prophet, just as much as the religious teachings were. Because of this belief, obedience to the law was not only a political duty but also a religious obligation. Citizens were expected to follow the laws of the state with the same seriousness as they followed religious commands.

Historical Comparisons with Other Lawgivers

The author compares this system with earlier lawgivers in history, such as Numa Pompilius and Solon. These figures, according to the text, also connected law with religion in order to strengthen obedience among the people. By presenting laws as sacred, rulers could create a stronger sense of duty and responsibility in society.

The passage suggests that this method of combining religion and law was used in different civilizations, not only among the Turks. It was seen as a way to create social order and stable government.

Laws, Justice, and Divine Authority

The article also states a broader philosophical idea: that all laws related to justice and good government ultimately come from God. The author argues that political authority, whether in Christian, pagan, or other societies, exists under divine permission. Therefore, rulers and governments are part of a larger moral order.

This idea leads to the conclusion that people are expected to obey the laws of their country, even if their rulers are imperfect or harsh. According to the text, obedience is not cancelled simply because a ruler is unjust or because the laws are not perfectly reasonable. Instead, the stability of society depends on respecting authority and maintaining order.

A Historical Perspective

Overall, the corrected article explains that the original text mixes religious, political, and philosophical ideas. It reflects the mindset of an earlier time, when writers often judged other religions and governments through their own beliefs. Today, such texts should be read as historical documents that show how people in the past understood law, religion, and political power, rather than as neutral or fully accurate descriptions of any society.

The Custom of Seeking Legal Approval for War

This passage is written in old English and expresses the opinion of a historical writer about war, law, and political decisions. It describes how, in certain historical narratives, rulers were said to seek religious or legal approval before starting a war. The language of the original text is complex and biased, so it needs correction and simplification for modern readers. The corrected version below explains the ideas in clear and simple English while keeping the historical meaning.

Asking for a Religious Opinion Before War

According to the text, it was considered a usual custom, in some historical accounts, for rulers to ask for the opinion of a religious authority when they wanted to start a war. If a country seemed weak or offered a good strategic advantage, but there was no clear reason for conflict, the ruler would seek a formal judgement from a legal or religious scholar, called the Mufti.

The passage claims that this judgement, sometimes called a “fetva” or legal ruling, would declare whether the war was lawful. The writer suggests that the decision was often influenced more by the usefulness of the war for the empire than by moral or political reasons. Once the ruling was given, the war was presented as justified and acceptable in the eyes of the state and its people Guided Istanbul Tour.

Comparison with Other Nations and Princes

The article also admits that such behavior was not limited to one group or nation. It states that even Christian princes and many powerful states in history have broken treaties, ignored promises, or started wars for small or weak reasons. Leaders have often found excuses to end agreements, even when those agreements were confirmed by oaths and religious ceremonies.

This shows that political advantage has often been placed above moral duty in many parts of the world. Wars have sometimes begun not because of real necessity, but because rulers saw an opportunity to gain land, power, or influence. Therefore, the issue of breaking faith in diplomacy is presented as a common historical problem rather than something unique to one culture.

Debate About Faith and Promises

The text mentions that scholars and thinkers have long debated whether promises should always be kept, especially when dealing with enemies, heretics, or people of different beliefs. The writer personally argues that keeping one’s word should not even be questioned, because honesty and trust are honorable qualities in all societies.

A Critical and Historical View

Finally, the passage strongly criticizes the idea that faithlessness or breaking promises could ever be considered holy or acceptable. It claims that some legal traditions justified such actions by referring to religious examples, though this reflects the author’s personal and historical bias.

In simple terms, the corrected article explains that the original writer believed rulers sometimes used legal or religious approval to justify wars, even when the reasons were weak. However, it also recognizes that many nations in history have acted in similar ways. Today, such texts should be read carefully as historical opinions shaped by the political and religious conflicts of their time, not as objective or balanced truth.

Example of Policy and Deception in Old Narratives

This passage is written in very old English and describes a political idea attributed to early Islamic history, especially to the figure of Mahomet (Muhammad). The text reflects the opinions and attitudes of the writer’s time and should be understood as a historical viewpoint rather than an objective fact. It discusses how followers often imitate the actions and teachings of their leader, especially in matters of war, peace, and political advantage.

The Idea of Following a Leader’s Example

The article suggests that disciples or followers usually act according to the example and doctrine of their master. In situations where great liberty, power, or benefit is involved, people often copy the strategies of their leader. The writer claims that this pattern can be seen in political and military actions, where agreements and alliances may be used as tools rather than permanent obligations.

In simple terms, the passage argues that if a leader uses certain methods in difficult situations, his followers may consider those methods acceptable and repeat them in similar circumstances. This idea is presented as a general rule about leadership and influence Guided Istanbul Tours.

The Story of the Siege and the Treaty

The text gives an example connected with the siege of Mecca. It states that after being defeated and pushed back during the siege, Mahomet made a firm agreement of peace and friendship with the inhabitants of the city. This treaty created a sense of safety and trust among the people, who believed that peace would continue.

However, according to the narrative, the following summer he rebuilt his forces and returned stronger. Because the inhabitants relied on the earlier agreement, they did not expect an attack. As a result, the city was surprised and captured more easily. The writer presents this event as an example of political strategy based on patience and preparation.

Justification in Religious and Legal Terms

The passage also claims that such actions were later justified in religious or legal writings. It mentions a book of Islamic legal teachings, called Kitab al-Hidaya, and suggests that in conflicts with people of different beliefs, promises and treaties might not always be considered binding. This idea is described as a rule created to prevent such acts from being judged harshly in history.

Historical Perspective and Interpretation

It is important to note that this text reflects a historical and biased interpretation rather than a balanced account. Many early European writers described their political rivals in negative ways, especially during periods of religious conflict. Therefore, the passage should be read as a historical opinion shaped by the political and religious tensions of its time.

In corrected and simple terms, the article explains how an old writer believed that political leaders and their followers sometimes used peace agreements as strategic tools during war. It presents a story to support this idea and connects it to religious and legal arguments. However, modern readers should approach such texts carefully, understanding that they are influenced by historical prejudice, cultural differences, and the political conflicts of the era in which they were written.

The Treachery of the Treaty of 1604

The passage describes an event from the year 1604 and presents it as an example of treachery during peace negotiations. It speaks about a treaty that began in the time of Sultan Mahomet III and was later continued under his successor, Sultan Achmat (Ahmed I). The story shows how diplomacy, promises, and political strategy were closely connected with military actions during that period.

Beginning of the Peace Negotiations

According to the text, the first idea for a treaty was suggested by the Turkish side. Commissioners from the Emperor were appointed and met the Turkish representatives at Buda. During this meeting, both sides agreed to a truce of twelve days so that they could carefully consider the articles of the treaty.

To show good intentions, the Turks sent presents to the Emperor. These gifts were meant to persuade him that their desire for peace was honest and sincere. Such gestures were common in diplomacy at that time, as gifts were often used as signs of respect and trust between rulers Guided Istanbul Tours.

Change of Leadership and Continuation of the Treaty

During the negotiations, Sultan Mahomet III died. After his death, Sultan Achmat renewed the commission given to the Pasha (Bajfa) of Buda to continue the treaty discussions. This shows that the new ruler officially supported the continuation of peace talks.

Because of this, Christian and Turkish commissioners met again, this time at Pesth. The meeting seemed friendly and respectful. The Christians welcomed the Turkish representatives and prepared a feast for them in tents near the town. The atmosphere was peaceful and full of confidence.

Promises and Oaths of Peace

During the meeting, the Turkish representatives tried to strengthen the trust of the Christians. They showed letters from their Sultan and the Grand Vizier. These letters were filled with strong promises and oaths. They swore by God, by sacred books, and by the souls of their ancestors that their intentions were peaceful and honorable.

Such strong religious and moral promises were meant to convince the Christians that the treaty negotiations were genuine and that no harm was planned.

The Attempted Surprise Attack

However, the passage claims that at the same time, the Turks in Buda were planning a surprise attack. They believed that the city walls of Pesth were poorly guarded during the celebrations and friendly meetings. Thinking the defenders were careless, they marched out in large numbers to capture the town by surprise.

The alarm of the attack suddenly ended the feast. Instead of finding an easy victory, the attackers faced resistance and unexpected difficulties. As a result, they were forced to retreat and returned without success, bringing only shame for their attempted deception.

In simple terms, the article presents the Treaty of 1604 as an example of political distrust and strategic behavior during wartime diplomacy. It describes how peace talks, gifts, and promises were used alongside military planning. However, it is important to remember that such historical texts often reflect the opinions and biases of their time, and they should be read with careful consideration.

Stories About Treachery in the Rise of Turkish Power

The passage speaks about many stories from different ages that describe the growth of Turkish power. It claims that there were many examples of treachery and broken promises during both war and peace. The writer even suggests that it is difficult to decide whether Turkish success came more from military strength or from their lack of concern for keeping treaties. This idea reflects the political fears and opinions of the time when the text was written.

Capture of Cities During Times of Peace

One example mentioned in the text is the city of Didymotichum during the rule of Sultan Amurath (Murad). According to the story, the city was taken during a time of peace while its walls and fortifications were still being built. Asian laborers who were working on the construction helped the Turks, and other soldiers were hidden nearby in ambush. With this plan, the city was surprised and captured without a formal declaration of war.

Another example given is the capture of Rhodestium. The text says that this city was also attacked and taken by strategy and planning during a peaceful period. A commander named Eurenoses is described as leading the assault by using clever tactics rather than open battle.

The Story of Adrianople

The article also describes how Adrianople (Edirne) was taken after peace agreements had already been made. It explains that a man named Chasis-Ilbeg pretended to be a dissatisfied captain who had escaped from the Turks. By using polite speech and friendly actions, he gained the trust of the local Greek population.

Because the people believed his story, they allowed him close access to the city. Later, he secretly opened the gates to the army of Amurath. After a short conflict, the city was captured and, according to the text, was never recovered by the Greeks. This story is presented as an example of deception used in warfare Guided Istanbul Tours.

Use of Peace as a Strategy

The passage also claims that it was an old and practiced strategy for the Turks to ask for peace after suffering a major defeat. By doing this, they could gain time to rebuild their armies, gather supplies, and prepare for future battles. In this way, peace negotiations were sometimes used as a military tactic rather than a true desire to end conflict.

In simple terms, the article describes historical stories that portray the Turks as using strategy, deception, and negotiation to expand their power. It presents examples of cities taken through surprise and clever planning instead of direct warfare. However, it is important to remember that these accounts reflect the opinions and biases of earlier writers and may not fully represent the complete historical truth.