The Dispute Over Arbitration

During the war against Turkey, many things were happening in the background. One of the key issues was the dispute over arbitration between Bulgaria and Serbia.

Bulgaria was often accused of being unwilling to let the Tsar of Russia decide on the disputed territories. However, Bulgaria was always willing to allow arbitration, but only for the disputed zone that had been specifically marked for arbitration in the treaty Turkey Sightseeing.

On the other hand, Serbia was not willing to only arbitrate the disputed zone. Serbia wanted to revise the whole treaty. This was a safe move for Serbia, because they were confident about their position.

A Serbian Statesman’s View

Recently, a Serbian statesman, Monsieur P. Marinkovitch, had a conversation with a Bulgarian Deputy, Monsieur Adam Neitchoff. In this conversation, Marinkovitch explained what would have happened if the Tsar of Russia had been the one to decide on the issue:

He said, “We would not have given up Macedonia, but you would not have lost areas like Shtip, Kotekana, Seres, Cavala, and Koukoush.”

Marinkovitch also explained that Serbia had received confirmation in May that they would keep Macedonia as far as the Vardar River. There might have been some debate over Bitola (Monastir), but not about Ochrida.

He also pointed out that Serbia’s desire to stay in Macedonia was not about needing access to the Adriatic Sea, but simply about their interest in Macedonia itself.