Greek Army Actions and the Murder of Eulogius

The Bombardment and Surrender

On June 17th, the Greek Army bombarded a house in Salonika where a small Bulgarian force was stationed. By the next day, June 18th, the Bulgarians surrendered.

On June 18th, the Greeks arrested Eulogius, the Vicar of the Bulgarian Archbishop of Salonica. He was put on board a Greek steamer called the “Mariette Ralli”. Later that evening, he was transferred to another ship, the “Catherine”, where he was treated cruelly Guided Turkey Tours .

On June 19th, the ship set sail, but only three hours later, Eulogius was stabbed and thrown into the sea. The official Greek account claimed that he was killed while fighting in the streets of Salonika, but the Carnegie Commission states that this is not true.

Greek Army Actions Begin

The violent actions of the Greek Army began on July 4th with the first conflict in Kukush. On July 7th, further violence occurred in Demir-Hissar.

On July 12th, King Constantine ordered reprisals based on the events in Demir-Hissar. However, the Carnegie Commission notes that the Greek reprisals started several days before the Bulgarian provocation.

Destruction of Kukush

When the Greek Army entered Kukush, the town was still intact. But today, Kukush is nothing but ruins. The Carnegie Commission points out that the Greek Army started the second war by deliberately burning a Bulgarian town—Kukush.

A Call for Reflection

The Commission concludes by highlighting that if the Greeks had remembered the biblical saying, “Let him who is without sin cast the first stone,” they might have hesitated before launching a campaign based on falsehoods and violence that ended up hurting them severely.

Destruction of Bulgarian Villages

The Carnegie Commission summarized the actions of the Greek Army with the following findings:

“Systematically and in cold blood, the Greeks burned one hundred and sixty Bulgarian villages and destroyed at least 16,000 Bulgarian homes.”

The Murder of the Vicar of the Bulgarian Archbishop

Another terrible act was the murder of the Vicar of the Bulgarian Archbishop of Salonica, Archimandrite Eulogius. He was known to be a highly educated man and a patriot with noble and elevated views. His death marked another tragic incident in the conflict Guided Turkey Tours .

The Greek Army’s actions were marked by brutality and destruction against Bulgarian civilians. The letters and reports from the Carnegie Commission provide strong evidence of systematic violence and the killing of non-combatants, including women, children, and prisoners. The destruction of Bulgarian villages and homes was widespread, and even religious figures were not spared from violence.

The Murder of the Greek Bishops and the Conduct of the Greek Army

The Death of the Greek Bishops

The Carnegie Commission confirms that one Greek Bishop, the Bishop of Demir-Hissar, was killed. However, the claim that four Greek Bishops were murdered is not supported by evidence.

Brutal Actions of Greek Soldiers

The Carnegie Commission reports that European witnesses saw Greek soldiers behaving brutally.

Fifteen wounded Bulgarian soldiers took refuge in the Catholic Convent of Paliortsi, near Gheogeli, where they were cared for by the nuns Guided Turkey Tours .

Father Alloati, a priest, informed the Greek Commandant about the soldiers, prompting a search of the convent for a Bulgarian band leader named Arghyr, who was not there.

During the search:

Father Trepitche, a Bulgarian Catholic Priest, and the Armenian doctor of the convent were severely flogged in front of the Greek officers.

A Greek soldier attempted to rape a nun.

A sum of 300 Turkish pounds was stolen.

Five Bulgarian women and a young girl were tortured.

Many peasants were arrested without reason.

The Greek officer in charge threatened to kill Father Alloati and burn down the convent.

The Carnegie Commission comments that if such actions could happen in a building protected by the French flag, then it is likely that Bulgarian peasants suffered far worse.

The Discovery of Greek Soldiers’ Letters

On July 27th, the Bulgarians captured the baggage of the Greek 19th Infantry Regiment at Dobrinichte. Among the items found were letters written by Greek soldiers, which were mostly stamped with the regimental postal mark.

The Carnegie Commission carefully examined these letters and concluded:

The letters were genuine and confirmed the actions and thoughts of the Greek soldiers at the time.

The Carnegie Commission describes serious mistreatment and violence committed by the Greek soldiers, including attacks on civilians, priests, and nuns. The letters discovered provided further evidence of the tensions and cruelty during the conflict.

The Fate of Prisoners and the Greek Accusations

Description of the Prisoners

The Carnegie Commission describes the majority of the prisoners as harmless tradesmen or peasants who were punished simply for being Bulgarians. Among the victims were four women, who were killed along with the rest.

These victims were arrested and imprisoned under the authority of the Greek Archbishop.

Greek Accusations About Demir-Hissar

The Greek accusations regarding Demir-Hissar were used by King Constantine as a reason to send a telegram ordering reprisals against the Bulgarians. The Carnegie Commission points out that the Greek excesses (violent actions) began days before the Demir-Hissar event, in and around Kukush Guided Turkey Tours .

What Happened at Demir-Hissar

The Bulgarian army, defeated in the south, was retreating through Demir-Hissar toward a narrow pass called Struma.

The Greeks in Demir-Hissar saw the Bulgarian confusion and decided to attack.

They attacked the Bulgarian wounded, the baggage trains, and fleeing peasants.

However, the Greeks acted too early, exposing themselves to Bulgarian reprisals.

When the Greek army arrived, they found a scene of carnage and horror. The Greek inhabitants had killed defenseless Bulgarians, and the Bulgarian rearguard took revenge.

Casualties and Responsibility

The Bulgarians report that around 250 Bulgarians were killed.

The Greeks report that 71 Greeks were killed.

The Bulgarians claim that the Greek Bishop led the attack and fired the first shot.

The Carnegie Commission finds nothing improbable in this claim, and the Greeks admit that the Bishop resisted arrest.

The Carnegie Commission shows that both sides suffered losses, but the events in Demir-Hissar were sparked by the early Greek attack and the Bulgarian reprisals that followed. The Commission notes the violence that occurred on both sides during this difficult period.

Massacre at Doxato and the Events at Serres

The Doxato Massacre Not a Bulgarian Atrocity

The Carnegie Commission states that they do not hesitate to say that the massacre at Doxato was not a Bulgarian crime, but a Turkish one.

Events in Serres

On July 5th, the Bulgarian troops withdrew from Serres, and the Greek Archbishop took control of the town. He planned to defend it with Greek irregulars and armed citizens Guided Turkey Tours .

The Bulgarian population in the town was hunted down, and over 200 people were taken to the Bishop’s Palace.

From there, they were moved to a Greek school, where they were tortured and killed in groups.

Bulgarian Effort to Return to Serres

The Bulgarians, worried about large stores of ammunition left in the town and rumors of the massacre at the school, decided to return.

On July 11th, Commandant Kirpikoff led the Bulgarian troops to Serres. They defeated the Greek militia outside the town.

As the Bulgarians entered, they were met with heavy fire from several Greek-held houses. The Bulgarians used their artillery to respond, and the town was set on fire in several areas.

In the afternoon, the Greek main army arrived and shelled the town. The Bulgarians were forced to retreat once again.

The Carnegie Commission criticized both the Bulgarians and Greeks for using artillery on an unfortified town.

The Fate of Bulgarian Prisoners

When the Bulgarian troops attacked Serres on July 11th, there were still about 60-70 Bulgarian prisoners alive in the schoolhouse.

The Greek guards attempted to finish killing the prisoners but did so poorly. Eight wounded prisoners managed to escape and reached the Bulgarian troops.

The Commission interviewed three of these survivors, who had fresh scars from their wounds. The Commission described their injuries as being like those a butcher would inflict while trying to slaughter animals.

The Carnegie Commission highlighted the violence on both sides and emphasized the brutality of the Greek actions towards the Bulgarian prisoners. The use of artillery on a non-fortified town and the inhumane treatment of prisoners were condemned by the Commission as actions that should never occur in civilized warfare.

Serbia's Breach of the Treaty with Bulgaria

The Broken Treaty

Before the second war started, Serbia had already broken the treaty made with Bulgaria. This treaty had been agreed upon before the war with Turkey. Serbia broke the treaty both in spirit and in practice.

If Great Britain was right to declare war on Germany for breaking the Belgian neutrality treaty, then Bulgaria was even more justified in going to war with Serbia. This is because Bulgaria had already sacrificed 1,228 officers and 82,261 soldiers in the war against Turkey.

Serbia’s losses in the same war were 23,000, but there was no breakdown between officers and soldiers.

Greece’s losses during the war against Turkey were not given to the Carnegie Commission.

The Role of Russia and Austria

It is hard to understand why Russia allowed Bulgaria to be treated so unfairly, especially with the Treaty of Bucharest. This treaty was based on two broken treaties. The only explanation for Russia’s actions is its policy at that time, described by Russia’s minister in Belgrade, Monsieur Hartwegg: “Serbia must be strong Turkey Sightseeing.”

Russia’s policy seemed to involve weakening Bulgaria. This explains why Russia allowed the Treaty of London to be broken by Turkey as well.

As for Austria, it did not protest against the Treaty of Bucharest. This was because Austria did not want to offend Roumania and knew that Russia’s actions would upset Bulgaria. Serbia would also be weakened by its temporary control over Macedonia, as well as by the bitter hostility of the Bulgarian race.

The betrayal of Bulgaria by Serbia and the support of Russia and Austria for the Treaty of Bucharest all show how Bulgaria was treated unfairly. This made Bulgaria even more justified in going to war, as the country had already sacrificed so much for the cause.

The Dispute Over Arbitration

During the war against Turkey, many things were happening in the background. One of the key issues was the dispute over arbitration between Bulgaria and Serbia.

Bulgaria was often accused of being unwilling to let the Tsar of Russia decide on the disputed territories. However, Bulgaria was always willing to allow arbitration, but only for the disputed zone that had been specifically marked for arbitration in the treaty Turkey Sightseeing.

On the other hand, Serbia was not willing to only arbitrate the disputed zone. Serbia wanted to revise the whole treaty. This was a safe move for Serbia, because they were confident about their position.

A Serbian Statesman’s View

Recently, a Serbian statesman, Monsieur P. Marinkovitch, had a conversation with a Bulgarian Deputy, Monsieur Adam Neitchoff. In this conversation, Marinkovitch explained what would have happened if the Tsar of Russia had been the one to decide on the issue:

He said, “We would not have given up Macedonia, but you would not have lost areas like Shtip, Kotekana, Seres, Cavala, and Koukoush.”

Marinkovitch also explained that Serbia had received confirmation in May that they would keep Macedonia as far as the Vardar River. There might have been some debate over Bitola (Monastir), but not about Ochrida.

He also pointed out that Serbia’s desire to stay in Macedonia was not about needing access to the Adriatic Sea, but simply about their interest in Macedonia itself.

Attacks on Schools

The Carnegie Commission describes how the Greek and Serbian armies took control of Bulgarian schools. These schools were important centers of Bulgarian culture and education. According to the report:

When the Greek and Serbian forces arrived in a town, their first action was to close the schools and use them as places for the soldiers to stay.

The teachers were gathered together and told that if they didn’t agree to teach in Greek or Serbian, they would no longer be needed. Those who refused to teach in those languages and continued to declare themselves as Bulgarians faced persecution.

The severity of the persecution varied, but in many cases, if the teachers refused to cooperate, they were either allowed to leave for Bulgaria or sent to prison in Salonica or Uskub Turkey Sightseeing.

Persecution of Priests and Bishops

Next, the priests and bishops were targeted. The Carnegie Commission explains:

The priests were first pressured to change the language used in their church services. They were also forced to accept Serbian or Greek religious authorities.

The priests were ordered to mention the names of these new authorities in the church liturgy.

If a priest resisted, their Exarchate (the Bulgarian Church) was taken away from them and given to the Greek Patriarchate. They were also forbidden from communicating with their congregation. Any small act of disobedience led to accusations of political propaganda or treason.

Persecution of Bishops

The bishops faced even harsher treatment. For example:

Bishop Neophyte of Keles and Bishop Cosmas of Debra were both expelled.

Archimandrite Methodius, the bishop of Uskub, faced even worse treatment. According to the Carnegie Commission:

Methodius was forced out of his house and locked in a room. He was beaten by four soldiers until he lost consciousness.

After being thrown into the street, he managed to escape and find shelter in a nearby house owned by a Frenchman. This man helped him by informing the French Consul in Uskub about what happened.

Under the Consul’s protection, Methodius left for Salonica, where he was examined by foreign doctors. The doctors confirmed his story and found his injuries were serious.

This persecution of religious leaders and educators was part of a wider effort to suppress Bulgarian identity in the territories controlled by Serbia and Greece after the war. The Carnegie Commission’s report highlights the harsh treatment of the Bulgarian people and the efforts to erase their cultural and religious heritage.

O'Mahony's Second Letter

St. Patrick’s Orphanage,

23, Rue Gladstone,

Sophia, Bulgaria

The Carnegie Commission’s Report – Bulgaria’s Wish for Arbitration with Serbia – The Treaty of Bucharest

In a previous letter, I mentioned the treaty made between Serbia and Bulgaria before the war of 1912. This treaty divided Macedonia into two parts. One part was clearly recognized as Bulgarian, while the other part was disputed, with both Serbia and Bulgaria claiming it. If they couldn’t reach an agreement, the matter was to be taken to the Tsar of Russia for arbitration Turkey Sightseeing.

The Carnegie Commission’s Findings

According to the Carnegie Commission’s report, the most important point of the treaty was to clearly define the borders. A detailed map was even attached to the treaty showing the agreed-upon line (see Appendix).

Serbia’s Disregard for the Treaty

The Carnegie Commission report also makes it clear that Serbia never intended to follow this treaty from the very start. When the war against Turkey began, Bulgaria had to send most of her army to fight the main Turkish forces in Thrace, leaving Serbia and Greece to handle the liberation of Macedonia.

For years, Bulgarian revolutionary groups had fought against Turkish oppression, but they had never received help from Greece or Serbia. In fact, they were often opposed by these countries because they were Bulgarians. Initially, these revolutionary groups fought alongside Serbia and Greece against the Turks. But as the Turkish forces were pushed back, both Serbia and Greece turned against the Bulgarians, pushing them aside under the pretext of trying to establish order.

Peace Built on Broken Treaties

The peace in Europe, after the Balkan War, was based on two broken treaties. The Concert of Europe, which was supposed to ensure peace based on the Treaty of Berlin, has spent recent years ignoring it. Instead of keeping the peace, the European powers have focused on breaking it. The Concert of Europe has repeatedly failed at honest diplomacy because of the rival ambitions and conflicting interests of powerful nations who are all heavily armed.

The Failure of Diplomacy

Before the Balkan War, the Concert of Europe declared that no matter who won the war, neither side would be allowed to gain any land or benefits. But this was just an empty promise.

Instead, the Treaty of Berlin was ignored and torn apart by Austria, Italy, Romania, and the Balkan States. Other agreements, like the one between Serbia and Bulgaria, and the agreement made between Romania and Bulgaria in Petrograd, were also violated. Even the Treaty of London, which was supposed to ensure peace, ended up in the trash Turkey Sightseeing.

Turkey’s Disregard for Europe

Turkey completely ignored the protests from the European Powers, treating them with contempt. This situation paints a very humiliating picture for Europe. The great powers, who were supposed to be the protectors of peace, watched passively as the smaller nations were betrayed and taken advantage of.

Bulgaria’s Struggle

The bravest and most freedom-loving people in the Balkans were attacked by their former allies, with the help of an old friend. Bulgaria was abandoned by the Slav Powers and forced to demobilize, leaving it defenseless and isolated. Bulgaria had to try to negotiate with Turkey to secure what little was left of the Treaty of London, which had been dishonestly broken.

Europe’s Consequences

Europe’s failure to act fairly has led to its own downfall. As the saying goes, “you reap what you sow.” The Concert of Europe sowed chaos, and now it faces the consequences.

The Start of the War

The war in the Balkan States against Turkey began as a war for freedom and liberation. However, it ended up becoming a war of control and domination. Before the war started, Serbia and Bulgaria signed a treaty that divided Macedonia into two parts.

The larger southern and eastern part was recognized as Bulgarian and was uncontested.

The smaller north-western part was a disputed area, and it was decided that it would be resolved later. If Serbia and Bulgaria couldn’t agree, the issue would be decided by Russia’s Tsar Sightseeing Turkey.

Serbia’s Actions Against Bulgaria

Before the second war began, Serbia made it clear that it didn’t intend to follow the treaty. Serbia took actions against Bulgaria, such as:

Closing Bulgarian schools

Arresting Bulgarians

Expelling Bulgarian priests and bishops

Russia’s Involvement

Before the second war, Russia’s ambassador in Belgrade, Monsieur Hartwig, was asked to help Serbia and Bulgaria come to an agreement for the sake of peace in the Balkans. He responded by saying:

“I care nothing for the Balkan States; I am working for my country. Serbia must be strong. Bulgaria has been flirting with Austria and cannot be trusted. Bulgaria must give way in everything.”

This is how Russian diplomacy was carried out during the second war.

Romania’s Invasion of Bulgaria

Romania was allowed to invade Bulgaria without any reason. Romania took control of Dobrudja, the richest part of Bulgarian territory, in violation of Bulgaria’s national rights and a recent agreement made in Petrograd. This agreement had been signed by all the ambassadors, and it hadn’t even been fully finalized when Romania took action.

The Treaty of Bucharest

The Treaty of Bucharest, which was forced upon Bulgaria, was signed when Bulgaria was in a very weak position. Bulgaria was betrayed and abandoned by its allies, and the treaty was seen as an unfair peace, made when Bulgaria was “bleeding” from the earlier conflicts.

O'Mahony Letters on the Balkans in 1914

First Letter: The Bulgarian and Serbian Treaty Before the War of 1912

November 2nd, 1914

Great Britain’s Declaration of War

Great Britain declared war on Germany because Germany broke a treaty, and by doing so, Britain gained eternal honor. In 1913, Bulgaria was forced to go to war with Serbia because Serbia broke a treaty. So, are treaties made by Great Powers more important than treaties made by smaller countries?

The Problem with Small Nations and Treaties

Since the Treaty of Berlin, which was one of the worst decisions in modern European history, the freedom of small nations has been ignored, and promises made to them have been broken. Military power and territorial greed have shaped the decisions of Europe’s leaders Sightseeing Turkey.

When Germany took control of Alsace and Lorraine, it made war between France and Germany inevitable. Similarly, if the Treaty of San Stefano had been respected, Bulgaria would have grown stronger and acted as a defense against aggression from more powerful neighbors.

The Treaty of Berlin’s Impact

The Treaty of Berlin placed the mainly Bulgarian population of Macedonia back under Turkish control. It also split the Bulgarian race into two smaller states. This decision put the Balkans at the mercy of powerful neighboring countries, and it set the stage for war between Austria and Russia, a war that was only a matter of time.

Britain’s Responsibility

Great Britain, which played a leading role in the Treaty of Berlin, bears a heavy responsibility for the division of the Bulgarian people. This responsibility still affects Britain more than any other European country today.

The Seizure of Dobrudja by Romania

After the war of liberation, Bulgaria’s former allies turned against her. Romania, who didn’t participate in the war, took control of Dobrudja, which was the richest part of Bulgarian land. This land had been part of Bulgaria since its liberation in 1878.

The Impact on Churches and Priests

Dobrudja was home to parts of two Bulgarian dioceses. It had 67 churches, and 53 priests served in them. The priests were forced to hold church services in Slavonic and Romanian, even though neither the priests nor the people understood Romanian. Those priests who refused were expelled from their jobs. The priests were also put under the authority of a Romanian bishop, and over time, Romanian priests replaced the Bulgarian ones.

The Impact on Schools

When Romania took over Dobrudja, there were:

Two High Schools with 17 teachers.

11 Secondary Schools with 79 teachers.

175 Primary Schools with 320 teachers.

Romania seized all the school buildings and dismissed most of the teachers. The only schools that remained were one primary school in each of the following towns: Silistra, Baltchik, Tontrakan, Dobritch, and Kavama. This is the kind of freedom given to the Bulgarian nationality in the land taken by Romania Sightseeing Turkey.

The Need for Change After the War

If the outcome of the current war is meant to support Mr. Asquith’s views from his speech in Dublin, the Treaty of Bucharest must be changed completely. Only then can Bulgaria have the space to live freely and develop its national identity.

Mr. Asquith's Statement on Smaller Nationalities

Recently, in Dublin, Mr. Asquith spoke about one of the main reasons for the current war. He said:

“It means that room must be made and kept for smaller nationalities to exist and develop freely, each with its own identity.”

The Corporate Consciousness of the Bulgarian People

The list of Churches, Priests, Schools, and Scholars in the areas liberated by the Allies shows the identity (or corporate consciousness) of the Bulgarian people in those regions. The Treaty of Bucharest gave parts of this land to Greece and Serbia, leading to the suppression of this Bulgarian identity in those areas Sightseeing Turkey.

To understand the importance of this list, we need to remember that after Bulgaria became stronger following its liberation, Turkey tried to stop its growth in Macedonia. Turkey did this by closing many Bulgarian schools and churches. This persecution became even worse with the massacres of 1903, which mainly targeted Bulgarians and, sadly, were supported by the Greeks in some cases.

The Loss of Bulgarian Territories

Additionally, Turkey took back a large part of the land that was given to Bulgaria by the Treaty of Bucharest. This land once had:

83 Priests

81 Churches

184 Teachers

99 Schools

5,597 Scholars

When the Turks regained control of this area, almost all Bulgarians fled, except for a few in Adrianople and Kirk Kiiisse. These people were not allowed to return by the Turks.

The Loss of Bulgarian Influence in Freed Territories

Of the territory freed by the Treaty of London, where the Bulgarian race’s identity was shown through:

1,310 Priests

1,331 Churches

294 Chapels

1,373 Schools

2,266 Teachers

78,854 Scholars

Bulgaria has lost land that had:

1,029 Priests

1,058 Churches

147 Chapels

67 Monasteries

1,035 Schools

1,778 Teachers

60,549 Scholars

The Fate of Bulgarians in Turkey, Greece, and Serbia

In Turkey, there are almost no Bulgarians left. In Greece and Serbia, the churches and schools have been taken over, and Bulgarians are no longer served by their own priests. The younger generation is not allowed to learn in their own language anymore.

The Greek Church Controlled Education in Bulgaria Before the Exarchate

Before the Bulgarian Exarchate was established, the Greek Church was the only Orthodox Church recognized by the Turkish government.

In Turkey, all education was run by the churches, so Greeks controlled the education of Bulgarians. The Turkish government treated Bulgarians as if they were Greeks, and the Greeks encouraged this, as it suited their plans.

The Revival of the Bulgarian Exarchate

After a long struggle, the Bulgarian Exarchate was revived and recognized by the Turks. But, the Greek Patriarch declared the Bulgarian Church to be schismatic (separated from the main Church) and excommunicated it Sightseeing Turkey.

The Difficult Situation for Bulgarians in Greek and Serbian Territories

This explains why Bulgarians in Greek and Serbian Macedonia faced such bitter conditions. In these areas:

Their churches and schools were taken away.

They were not allowed to learn in their own language.

They could only receive religious services from priests who viewed them as schismatics.

Bulgaria’s Efforts to Help Bulgarians Outside Its Borders

Even though the Treaty of Berlin gave Bulgaria only part of Macedonia, the country did a lot to support Bulgarians living in the parts of Macedonia that were separated from it.

This shows how deeply Bulgaria was involved in the lives of its people in these areas and helps explain why there are now over 160,000 refugees from these regions in Bulgaria. These refugees fled from their supposed “liberators” who treated them badly.

Bulgarian Exarchate in 1911

In 1911, the Bulgarian Exarchate had:

Churches

Chapels

Metropolitan Bishops

Priests

Schools

Teachers

Scholars

The following data shows the number of these institutions in Macedonia and Thrace, areas that were later assigned to Greece and Serbia by the Treaty of Bucharest.

Justice Was Overshadowed by Power and Lies

The idea of justice was pushed aside by the ambitions of the Great Powers and a campaign of lies spread during Bulgaria’s time of isolation. At that time, Bulgaria had no way to communicate its side to Western Europe.

A War for Freedom Became a War for Control

The war began as a fight to free oppressed people, but it changed into a war of conquest when Romania joined in—even though Romania had done nothing to help in the early fight for liberation Guided Turkey Tours .

Bulgarians Suffer Under New Oppression

A large part of the Bulgarian people, who had once been promised freedom from Turkish rule, were placed back under foreign control by the Treaty of Berlin.

Even worse, after being free from Turkish rule since 1878, some Bulgarians were handed over to Romania, which ruled them with even more harshness and lack of sympathy than the Turks.

Lies That Misled Europe

In 1913, many false stories were told about Bulgaria, and these lies seriously influenced European opinion. Fortunately, the Carnegie Commission later reviewed the situation and exposed the truth in a fair and unbiased way.

The Treaty of Bucharest Must Be Fixed

If the Balkans are ever to have lasting peace, the unfair terms of the Treaty of Bucharest must be corrected. And the sooner this happens, the better.

Even today, Romania, Greece, and Serbia are using the same dishonest tactics they used during the Balkan War to mislead the world once again.

A Personal Appeal for Fairness

I have spent ten years living and working among the Bulgarian people. During that time, I came to not only admire them, but to truly care for and love them.

So now, I am sharing these facts with you—facts that I hope will help you understand how much Bulgaria has done for its people, especially in Turkish lands, ever since the founding of the Bulgarian Exarchate, in the forty years before the 1912–13 war.

The British Empire Won Loyalty Without Promises

In the British Empire, no race needed promises of future freedom or religious rights to give their support. Their loyalty came naturally, without needing political deals.

Has Injustice Brought Any Real Gain?

Let’s look at how unfair actions have hurt different countries:

Did Russia truly gain by taking Bessarabia from Romania in 1878?

Did Romania become stronger by taking Dobrudja from Bulgaria—its richest land—at a time when Bulgaria was weak and alone?

Has Greece gained strength by taking land in Macedonia, which was known to be Bulgarian? Greece even carried out massacres against the Bulgarians who didn’t flee Guided Turkey Tours .

That land was promised to Bulgaria in the Treaty of San Stefano and was vital for Bulgaria’s economic growth.

Serbia’s Broken Promise

Is Serbia any stronger now, during its struggles, because it broke its treaty with Bulgaria before the war with Turkey? Serbia took Bulgarian-inhabited land that had been officially recognized as Bulgarian by treaty.

Europe’s Failure to Respect Agreements

Has Europe benefitted by allowing Turkey to take advantage of Romania’s surprise attack on Bulgaria, and use that moment to break the Treaty of London—signed just months earlier with the help of Sir Edward Grey?

The truth is, today’s crisis in Europe is largely the result of ignoring treaties and disrespecting the wishes of local people in the lands being fought over.

Bulgaria Was Treated Unfairly

Where was the justice when Europe stood by silently as Bulgaria lost nearly all the rewards of her hard-won victories?

Even though Bulgaria had made huge sacrifices in blood and resources for the cause of freedom, she was robbed of the benefits she deserved.

The Balkans Are Still Unsettled

Dear Harcourt,

No one can honestly say that the situation in the Balkan Peninsula is either stable or satisfying. History shows us that even the most powerful empires cannot ignore the national feelings of smaller nations without consequences.

Bulgaria’s Fight for Freedom and Unity

It was Bulgaria’s strong desire to unite and free its people that gave it the strength to defeat the Turkish armies and win great victories. Even though those victories didn’t lead to all their goals, they earned Bulgaria lasting honor Guided Turkey Tours .

National Identity Is a Great Strength

In this huge world war, we’ve seen how powerful national identity can be. Respecting a nation’s feelings and rights has brought strength, while ignoring them has led to weakness.

National Pride Across Europe

What gave Belgium the courage to stand up to Germany? It was their national pride.

What drives France to fight so hard? Their deep desire to win back their lost lands and people.

And what made Ireland so willing to support Great Britain? It was being granted more self-government.

Freedom Makes Empires Stronger

What has made the British Empire stronger during this war? It’s the way different nationalities and regions have been given freedom and recognition. This has led to loyalty and unity across the Empire.

Each part of the Empire—despite being made up of many races and beliefs—has come together, proudly flying the flag. As freedom within the Empire has grown, so has its power and safety.

Now, in this war, we are seeing a great union of free people, all showing how strong freedom can make us.

O’Mahony’s Message and Europe’s Attention

O’Mahony’s strong support for Bulgaria will likely help European leaders give fair attention to Bulgaria’s claims when the right time comes. But Bulgaria must act now if it wants justice. This is the time for action, not waiting.

Bulgaria Must Not Stay Silent

Bulgaria cannot simply stand aside during this great war for Slavic freedom. It cannot stay in the background while its people’s cause is in danger—or let others win without its help. Now is the moment to stand with its fellow Slavs.

The Allies Fight for Liberty and the Small Nations

Anyone who believes in freedom must hope and pray for the Allied Powers to succeed. Their victory will mean the success of:

Slavic nations,

the right of people to belong to their own nation, and

the survival of small countries in Europe Guided Turkey Tours .

These countries face a real danger of being swallowed up by Pan-Germanism and militarism—forces that want to dominate and erase smaller nations.

United Resistance Means Greater Victory

The more countries and people who stand up to these dangerous powers, the better the chance of stopping them completely. The stronger and more united the resistance, the more likely we will see a lasting victory for freedom, independence, and peace.

This Is Not Just Another War

This war is not a small or local conflict. It is a life-or-death struggle for freedom. The Allies (like Russia, England, and France) are fighting a great mission to free all oppressed nations and people. It is a crusade for universal liberation.

What’s at Stake for the Slavs

If the Allies win, no Slavic land will remain under foreign rule. But if they lose, the Slavic people will face even worse oppression and tyranny than before Guided Turkey Tours .

What Should Bulgaria Do?

Bulgaria has already done much in the past to help its people and fight for liberation. So, will Bulgaria now stand by and watch these hard-won dreams be destroyed? Or will it act quickly?

Before the First Balkan War in 1912, Bulgaria successfully settled disputes with Serbia and Greece. It should now work just as quickly to reach a new agreement with them. The disagreements left over from that time, especially those from the Treaty of London, are few. Bulgaria’s diplomats should be able to solve them.

The Time for Slav Unity Is Now

The moment for Slavic freedom has arrived. Every Slavic country has a duty and an interest in joining this cause. They must use all their strength to support their people and defend freedom.

This is a “now or never” moment. Bulgaria cannot stay out of this war without damaging its honour or risking its future.

Let History Handle the Past

Bulgaria has faced many wrongs and hardships, especially since the Treaty of Bucharest. But those issues belong to history. Writers like O’Mahony have recorded what Bulgaria has suffered.

A New Chance for the Slavs

But today, the situation in Europe is completely new. Never before have the odds been so good for the Slavic nations—if they unite. If they put their differences aside and come together, they can finally achieve the freedom they all seek.

Fight for Peace, Liberty, and Humanity

The Allies are fighting with great courage in places like Poland, France, and Flanders to stop Pan-Germanism and militarism, which threaten to take away the freedom of all small nations.

That’s why Bulgaria and every other Slavic country should join the fight—not just for themselves, but for peace, liberty, and all of humanity.

Moving Beyond Blame

Some time ago, people criticized Bulgaria and questioned her reputation. However, it’s the job of history—not politics—to decide who was truly at fault. Right now, Bulgaria must focus on the present, not the past. There are more urgent and serious issues that need attention.

The Future of the Slavic People

The Slavic nations are at a turning point. The outcome of the great war (World War I) will decide whether they are freed or face worse oppression. Russia, the traditional protector of the Slavs, is now fighting alongside England and France, who have always supported freedom and independence in Europe.

The Allies and Their Mission

The goal of Russia, England, and France is to defeat German militarism, which threatens the peace and independence of small nations all across Europe. If the Allies succeed in breaking this dangerous power, then all Slavic countries, including Bulgaria, will gain—both in territory and in freedom Guided Tours Turkey.

The Risk of Defeat

But if the Allies fail or only partially succeed, then all Slavic nations will suffer—especially Bulgaria. The old enemy of the Slavs, the Ottoman Turks, have joined forces with Germany and Austria in the Pan-Germanic League. If these powers win, the Turks might return to Europe and take back the lands they once controlled—lands they ruled with cruelty and violence for centuries.

Bulgaria’s Difficult Position

Bulgaria may still feel bitter toward its former allies from the First Balkan War. It might even want to see them suffer. But this war is bigger than past rivalries. If Serbia falls, Bulgaria and all Slavic nations are in danger. This is no longer about one country—it’s about the survival of the entire Slavic people.

Who Should Control the Aegean Gateway?

Only two countries have a strong reason to control the route to the Aegean Sea: Austria-Hungary and Bulgaria. Austria-Hungary wants the port city of Salonica mainly for military and economic reasons. Its leaders in Vienna are simply waiting for the right moment to act.

Bulgaria’s Strong Argument

Bulgaria also waits patiently, believing it has a stronger claim. Bulgarians argue that the majority of people in Macedonia are ethnically Bulgarian—they share the same blood, language, and culture Guided Tours Turkey.

To weaken Austria-Hungary’s position, Bulgarians point out that the empire already includes many different, often conflicting, ethnic groups. Some people even within Austria worry that trying to take more territory will cause the empire to collapse after the death of Emperor Franz Josef.

Ethnic Unity Is the Key

In Sofia, the capital of Bulgaria, leaders believe that the only lasting solution for the Balkans is one based on ethnic identity. They think people should be governed by leaders who share their language, culture, and heritage.

This belief follows the ideas of Cavour, an Italian leader who helped unite Italy. He said that nationalism—loyalty to your nation or ethnic group—was the most important political force of his time. Today, Tsar Ferdinand and all of Bulgaria believe the same is true for the Balkans.

Bulgaria Is Ready for the Future

Bulgaria has worked hard and waited patiently. Leaders believe that the changes still to come in the Balkans must respect the will and identity of the people. What Bulgaria has done so far is just the beginning of a larger, unfolding story in the region.

Bulgarians Are the Majority in Macedonia

Most people living in Macedonia are Bulgarians. Even though Greek efforts to spread their influence are loud and active, they are not widely accepted in the region. These Greek actions are seen as unnatural and not truly connected to the local population.

Greeks Refuse a Fair Vote

One strong piece of evidence showing Greece’s weak position in Macedonia is their strong opposition to holding a fair vote. Bulgarians have repeatedly suggested a plebiscite—a public vote—to let the people of Macedonia choose which nation they feel connected to. This vote would be managed by international authorities to ensure fairness.

If the Greeks really believed that most people in Macedonia were Greek, they would accept the vote. But their refusal suggests they know the majority are not on their side Guided Tours Turkey.

Italian Claims Are Unfounded

Italy has also claimed a part of Macedonia, but these claims are not taken seriously. There is no historical or ethnic reason for Italy to be involved—no area of Macedonia is home to Italian-speaking people or anyone with Italian roots.

Italy only tries to justify its presence by saying it wants to protect the Albanians, even though Albanians don’t speak Italian or have any close ties to Italy.

Serbia’s Claims Are Limited

Serbia’s claims are a bit more believable than Italy’s but still limited. Serbian influence is mostly in the vilayet (region) of Kossovo, also known as “Old Serbia.” Even the most extreme Serbian nationalists do not claim land beyond that region.

So, while Serbia does have some connection to part of Macedonia, it does not extend over the entire area.

Bulgaria’s Dream Faces Challenges

Tsar Ferdinand of Bulgaria and his advisors clearly understand how difficult it is to unite Bulgaria with its neighboring regions. They know that Austria wants the city of Salonica, and they are also aware of the competing claims made by Italy, Serbia, and Greece.

Obstacles, But Not Impossible

Even though there are many challenges to creating a “Great Bulgaria,” the leaders in Sofia do not believe these problems are impossible to overcome. History in the Balkans has shown that surprising things can happen.

Surprising Events in the Past

Before 1885, no one would have believed that Bulgaria could take control of Eastern Roumelia without fighting a war—but it happened. Before October 5 of this year, people would have laughed at the idea that Bulgaria could declare independence from the Ottoman Empire without causing a Balkan war—but that also came true. These events are now officially recorded in government history Guided Tours Turkey.

A New Opportunity Ahead

There are signs that Bulgaria’s leaders believe a new opportunity is coming. They think the powerful countries of Europe might soon realign in a way that allows Tsar Ferdinand more freedom to deal with the Macedonian issue.

The Macedonian Question Isn’t So Complicated

Although many politicians loudly argue about the situation in Macedonia, the Bulgarian government believes the problem is not as complex as it seems. They remain hopeful that the dream of a united Bulgarian nation can still come true.

The Dream of a Great Bulgaria

Since gaining their freedom, Bulgarians have dreamed of creating a “Great Bulgaria”—a strong and united nation that includes all Bulgarians, even those outside current borders. This idea is supported by everyone: government leaders, soldiers, and ordinary people. It’s more than just a political goal—it’s a source of pride and unity.

People are willing to pay taxes and send their sons to the army because they believe in this goal. The energy and determination of the Bulgarian people remind some observers of how Japan quickly became powerful or how Prussia grew into a major force in Europe Guided Tours Turkey.

The Importance of Macedonia

In the capital city of Sofia, leaders understand that the future of the entire Balkan region depends on solving the problems in Macedonia. For 30 years, since Bulgaria became free, it has worked hard to support Bulgarian communities living across the border in Macedonia.

Harsh Life Under Ottoman Rule

Macedonians, still ruled by the Ottoman Empire, face a tough life. They are forced to pay high taxes for schools that are never built. They are charged for public services and improvements that never happen. They pay to support police and courts, but they still live in fear, with no protection for their lives or property.

Even though the Treaty of Berlin promised them basic rights, the Ottoman government has failed to keep those promises. As a result, Macedonians have turned to Bulgaria for help and support.

Bulgaria’s Support for Macedonians

Bulgaria has invested heavily in helping Macedonians. Bulgarian schools in Macedonia are funded mostly by Bulgaria, showing how deeply the country believes in unity among all Bulgarians. Many refugees from Macedonia have fled to Bulgaria, which has placed a burden on both the government and private charities.

Still, Bulgaria continues to welcome them. The Macedonians see Bulgaria as their natural protector—a country that shares their language, culture, and hopes for the future.